Implementing artificial intelligence in the public sector

Implementing artificial intelligence requires institutional capacity, yet mismatches across public-sector tiers are often neglected. The central government typically has stronger capacity, centralised information systems, larger budgets, and direct access to national digital strategies, which increases AI readiness. In contrast, local government is fragmented and resource-constrained; AI readiness is reduced by non-interoperable systems, shortages of experts, and dependence on external vendors. National strategies often lack concrete municipal support mechanisms (shared platforms, targeted funding, training), leaving smaller municipalities reactive. This paper reviews and examines stakeholder inclusion in AI implementation and identifies key adoption factors. The analysis assumes both national and local digital strategies that specify rationales (service quality, process optimisation, transparency), employee training on ethics and digital skills, funding models, mechanisms to enhance municipal agility, and active involvement of citizens, experts, and other stakeholders. An exploratory case study was conducted using document analysis and focus groups, with interaction intensity assessed across the collaborative process.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Repository of the University of Ljubljana (University of Ljubljana)
Published
2026-03-23
Primary Topic
E-Government and Public Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implementing artificial intelligence in the public sector

Primož Pevcin, Rok Hržica, Katja Debelak
Repository of the University of Ljubljana (University of Ljubljana)
E-Government and Public Services
article

Implementing artificial intelligence in the public sector

Primož Pevcin, Rok Hržica, Katja Debelak
article en

Abstract

Implementing artificial intelligence requires institutional capacity, yet mismatches across public-sector tiers are often neglected. The central government typically has stronger capacity, centralised information systems, larger budgets, and direct access to national digital strategies, which increases AI readiness. In contrast, local government is fragmented and resource-constrained; AI readiness is reduced by non-interoperable systems, shortages of experts, and dependence on external vendors. National strategies often lack concrete municipal support mechanisms (shared platforms, targeted funding, training), leaving smaller municipalities reactive. This paper reviews and examines stakeholder inclusion in AI implementation and identifies key adoption factors. The analysis assumes both national and local digital strategies that specify rationales (service quality, process optimisation, transparency), employee training on ethics and digital skills, funding models, mechanisms to enhance municipal agility, and active involvement of citizens, experts, and other stakeholders. An exploratory case study was conducted using document analysis and focus groups, with interaction intensity assessed across the collaborative process.

Repository of the University of Ljubljana (University of Ljubljana)
University of Ljubljana (SI)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
E-Government and Public Services
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.