AI-Driven estimation of patient-specific aortic wall mechanical properties for improved biomechanical simulation

Finite element analysis (FEA) is widely used to estimate aortic wall stress in pathological conditions, with the main goal of assessing rupture or dissection risk[1]. However, patient-specific FEA is still hindered by the lack of non-invasive measurements of aortic wall mechanical properties. Because these properties can only be obtained from excised tissue, most simulations rely on generic material parameters derived from literature data, despite pronounced inter-patient variability[2]. To address this, we introduce a new framework that estimates patient-specific material behaviour by leveraging a database of human aortic tissue mechanics and a generative AI model, a conditional variational autoencoder (CVA). Through a literature review, we assembled 100 equibiaxial tensile tests on human aortic samples processed under consistent preservation protocols. This dataset includes paired circumferential and axial stress–stretch curves categorized according to four clinical factors: i) anatomical region, ii) pathology (thoracic aneurysm, dissection, Marfan syndrome, or healthy control), iii) valve morphology, and iv) age group (young, middle, old). For a given patient, the method first extracts the appropriate subgroup of the database based on these factors. Within this tailored subset, the curve that best matches the patient’s circumferential mechanical behaviour, estimated from systolic/diastolic pressures and aortic compliance, is selected. Once the closest circumferential curve is identified, the corresponding paired axial curve from the same tissue sample is automatically included, ensuring a consistent biaxial representation. To automate this process, we trained a CVA capable of generating stress–strain curves conditioned on patient-specific attributes. Validation was performed using tissue samples from 10 patients for whom both clinical data and ex vivo equibiaxial tests were available. A permutation test based on the L2 norm showed no significant difference between predicted and experimental curves in 8 out of 10 cases (p < 0.001). Preliminary analysis further demonstrates that the CVA successfully learns and reproduces the statistical characteristics inherent to each clinical subgroup. This approach offers a promising pathway toward integrating patient-specific mechanical surrogates into aortic biomechanics simulations, potentially improving risk stratification and personalized treatment planning.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Virtual Community of Pathological Anatomy (University of Castilla La Mancha)
Published
2026-01-01
Primary Topic
Elasticity and Material Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI-Driven estimation of patient-specific aortic wall mechanical properties for improved biomechanical simulation

I. Ianniruberto, J. W. Weinsaft, A. Redaelli, E. Votta et al.
Virtual Community of Pathological Anatomy (University of Castilla La Mancha)
Elasticity and Material Modeling
article

AI-Driven estimation of patient-specific aortic wall mechanical properties for improved biomechanical simulation

I. Ianniruberto, J. W. Weinsaft, A. Redaelli, E. Votta, D. Astori
article en

Abstract

Finite element analysis (FEA) is widely used to estimate aortic wall stress in pathological conditions, with the main goal of assessing rupture or dissection risk[1]. However, patient-specific FEA is still hindered by the lack of non-invasive measurements of aortic wall mechanical properties. Because these properties can only be obtained from excised tissue, most simulations rely on generic material parameters derived from literature data, despite pronounced inter-patient variability[2]. To address this, we introduce a new framework that estimates patient-specific material behaviour by leveraging a database of human aortic tissue mechanics and a generative AI model, a conditional variational autoencoder (CVA). Through a literature review, we assembled 100 equibiaxial tensile tests on human aortic samples processed under consistent preservation protocols. This dataset includes paired circumferential and axial stress–stretch curves categorized according to four clinical factors: i) anatomical region, ii) pathology (thoracic aneurysm, dissection, Marfan syndrome, or healthy control), iii) valve morphology, and iv) age group (young, middle, old). For a given patient, the method first extracts the appropriate subgroup of the database based on these factors. Within this tailored subset, the curve that best matches the patient’s circumferential mechanical behaviour, estimated from systolic/diastolic pressures and aortic compliance, is selected. Once the closest circumferential curve is identified, the corresponding paired axial curve from the same tissue sample is automatically included, ensuring a consistent biaxial representation. To automate this process, we trained a CVA capable of generating stress–strain curves conditioned on patient-specific attributes. Validation was performed using tissue samples from 10 patients for whom both clinical data and ex vivo equibiaxial tests were available. A permutation test based on the L2 norm showed no significant difference between predicted and experimental curves in 8 out of 10 cases (p < 0.001). Preliminary analysis further demonstrates that the CVA successfully learns and reproduces the statistical characteristics inherent to each clinical subgroup. This approach offers a promising pathway toward integrating patient-specific mechanical surrogates into aortic biomechanics simulations, potentially improving risk stratification and personalized treatment planning.

Virtual Community of Pathological Anatomy (University of Castilla La Mancha)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Elasticity and Material Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.