Jämförande analys av maskininlärningssurrogat för noggrann och realtidsbaserad

The escalating threat of climate-driven flooding (Core Writing Team et al., 2023) creates an urgent imperative for disaster preparedness systems that are both rapid and precise. Traditional hydrodynamic models, such as HEC-RAS, provide the necessary physical fidelity for mapping inundation but are computationally prohibitive for real-time Early Warning Systems (EWS). Conversely, standard library interpolation methods often fail to capture the non-linear complexities of modern flood dynamics, particularly when accounting for multiple hydrologicaldrivers. This Master’s thesis addresses this critical operational gap by developing and rigorously evaluating Machine Learning (ML) surrogate models capable of predicting flood extents instantly without sacrificing hydraulic accuracy. The study focuses on a high-risk 98 km reach of the Po River (Cremona-Borgoforte), utilizing high-fidelity HEC-RAS simulations to generate a synthetic training dataset. To identify the optimal architecture, five distinct regression models were implemented: Multiple Linear Regression, Support Vector Regression, Random Forest, Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and Gaussian Process Regression (GPR). These models were subjected to a hierarchical evaluation, testing their performance not only on interpolation within the training range but also on their "Extrapolation Robustness" against extreme, unobserved flood events (450-year and 500-year return periods).T he comparative analysis reveals a critical trade-off between local precision and global robustness. While tree-based ensembles (Random Forest and XGBoost) demonstrated superior accuracy in the interpolation regime, they exhibited a structural "saturation" bias during extreme events, systematically underestimating flood depths for discharges exceeding the training domain. In contrast, Gaussian Process Regression emerged as the robustest architecture. It maintained physical consistency during extrapolation and provided essential uncertainty quantification, offering a spatial map of model confidence. Consequently, this research establishes GPR as the viable candidate for operational EWS, enabling civil protection agencies to generate real-time, risk-informed inundation maps.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Published
2026-01-01
Primary Topic
Science and Climate Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Jämförande analys av maskininlärningssurrogat för noggrann och realtidsbaserad

Costanza Angelotti
KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Science and Climate Studies
article

Jämförande analys av maskininlärningssurrogat för noggrann och realtidsbaserad

Costanza Angelotti
article en

Abstract

The escalating threat of climate-driven flooding (Core Writing Team et al., 2023) creates an urgent imperative for disaster preparedness systems that are both rapid and precise. Traditional hydrodynamic models, such as HEC-RAS, provide the necessary physical fidelity for mapping inundation but are computationally prohibitive for real-time Early Warning Systems (EWS). Conversely, standard library interpolation methods often fail to capture the non-linear complexities of modern flood dynamics, particularly when accounting for multiple hydrologicaldrivers. This Master’s thesis addresses this critical operational gap by developing and rigorously evaluating Machine Learning (ML) surrogate models capable of predicting flood extents instantly without sacrificing hydraulic accuracy. The study focuses on a high-risk 98 km reach of the Po River (Cremona-Borgoforte), utilizing high-fidelity HEC-RAS simulations to generate a synthetic training dataset. To identify the optimal architecture, five distinct regression models were implemented: Multiple Linear Regression, Support Vector Regression, Random Forest, Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and Gaussian Process Regression (GPR). These models were subjected to a hierarchical evaluation, testing their performance not only on interpolation within the training range but also on their "Extrapolation Robustness" against extreme, unobserved flood events (450-year and 500-year return periods).T he comparative analysis reveals a critical trade-off between local precision and global robustness. While tree-based ensembles (Random Forest and XGBoost) demonstrated superior accuracy in the interpolation regime, they exhibited a structural "saturation" bias during extreme events, systematically underestimating flood depths for discharges exceeding the training domain. In contrast, Gaussian Process Regression emerged as the robustest architecture. It maintained physical consistency during extrapolation and provided essential uncertainty quantification, offering a spatial map of model confidence. Consequently, this research establishes GPR as the viable candidate for operational EWS, enabling civil protection agencies to generate real-time, risk-informed inundation maps.

KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Science and Climate Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.