Healthcare Professionals’ Perspectives and/or Experiences of Digital Mental Health Tools in Clinical Practice: A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis

Background: Mental health difficulties are highly prevalent worldwide. Digital mental health tools (DMHTs) have been developed to increase accessibility to mental healthcare for people who may struggle to access care due to cost, location or stigma. As the views of stakeholders are important in understanding the potential barriers to and facilitators of DMHT implementation, the aims of this review were to critically appraise and synthesise qualitative findings relating to the perceptions and/or experiences of healthcare professionals (HCPs) on the use of digital mental health tools in clinical practice.<br/>Method: A systematic search of mixed-method and qualitative studies was performed using five databases. Eligible studies were quality-assessed. Data were analysed using inductive thematic synthesis. <br/>Results: Fifteen studies were identified and reviewed. Four main themes (alongside eight subthemes) were developed from the data of 604 HCPs: 1) DMHTs should augment – not replace – face-to-face clinical care; 2) Considerations and caveats to use in clinical practice; 3) Using DMHTs to enhance clinical care; and 4) Perceived barriers and concerns. <br/>Conclusion: HCPs strongly endorsed the view that DMHTs offer increased access to care, however, concerns about their therapeutic quality, risk management, and workload burden persist. Context-sensitive implementation and proper infrastructure are essential for successful integration into mental health services.<br/>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Explorer (The University of Manchester)
Published
2026-03-20
Primary Topic
Digital Mental Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Healthcare Professionals’ Perspectives and/or Experiences of Digital Mental Health Tools in Clinical Practice: A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis

Emily; id_orcid 0000-0001-5164-2407 Eisner, Claudia Graves, Anja; id_orcid 0000-0003-3806-0183 Wittkowski
Research Explorer (The University of Manchester)
Digital Mental Health Interventions
article

Healthcare Professionals’ Perspectives and/or Experiences of Digital Mental Health Tools in Clinical Practice: A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis

Emily; id_orcid 0000-0001-5164-2407 Eisner, Claudia Graves, Anja; id_orcid 0000-0003-3806-0183 Wittkowski
article en

Abstract

Background: Mental health difficulties are highly prevalent worldwide. Digital mental health tools (DMHTs) have been developed to increase accessibility to mental healthcare for people who may struggle to access care due to cost, location or stigma. As the views of stakeholders are important in understanding the potential barriers to and facilitators of DMHT implementation, the aims of this review were to critically appraise and synthesise qualitative findings relating to the perceptions and/or experiences of healthcare professionals (HCPs) on the use of digital mental health tools in clinical practice.<br/>Method: A systematic search of mixed-method and qualitative studies was performed using five databases. Eligible studies were quality-assessed. Data were analysed using inductive thematic synthesis. <br/>Results: Fifteen studies were identified and reviewed. Four main themes (alongside eight subthemes) were developed from the data of 604 HCPs: 1) DMHTs should augment – not replace – face-to-face clinical care; 2) Considerations and caveats to use in clinical practice; 3) Using DMHTs to enhance clinical care; and 4) Perceived barriers and concerns. <br/>Conclusion: HCPs strongly endorsed the view that DMHTs offer increased access to care, however, concerns about their therapeutic quality, risk management, and workload burden persist. Context-sensitive implementation and proper infrastructure are essential for successful integration into mental health services.<br/>

Research Explorer (The University of Manchester)
Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Massachusetts Department of Mental Health (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Digital Mental Health Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Healthcare Professionals’ Perspectives and/or Experiences of Digital Mental Health Tools in Clinical Practice: A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis — Emily; id_orcid 0000-0001-5164-2407 Eisner, Claudia Graves, et al. · Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS