The Cost-Utility of a Workplace Mental Health Program for Employees with Common Mental Disorders (FRIAA Project).
This EE found that differences in costs were significant (with higher costs in the FRIAA group), while no statistically significant differences in QALYs were observed between the study groups. In addition, the cost-utility for FRIAA compared with CAU was not favourable. Participants with CMDs may need more time to integrate what they discuss in psychotherapy sessions into their daily lives before they can improve their personal quality of life and thus show long-term changes in sick days. Longer follow-up periods may be needed in future studies.
Authors
- Nicole Rosalinde Hander (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3155-9547)
- Meike Heming (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9533-4158)
- Jeannette Weber (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7023-7925)
- Marieke Hansmann (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9308-9646)
- Christoph Kröger (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2176-6078)
- Manuel Feißt (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5016-9731)
- Tamara Waldmann
- Harald Gündel (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7827-320X)
- Reinhold Kilian
- Regina Herold
- Eva Rothermund-Nassir
- Nadine Mulfinger
Institutions
- Universität Ulm (DE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- PubMed
- Published
- 2026-03-01
- Primary Topic
- Workplace Health and Well-being
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00