Carbon intensity disclosure and corporate credit spreads

Abstract We examine the link between carbon intensity and US corporate bond spreads in a sample of disclosing companies before and after 2020. We find a consistent discount among high-intensity companies of approximately 11 bps prior to 2020 compared to companies with median carbon intensity. From 2020 to 2022, the discount increases to 16 basis points for A-rated bonds, while it turns insignificant for BBB-rated bonds. For A-rated bonds, we find an increasing term structure in the carbon discount. Our results imply a discrepancy between the carbon risk perception of bond market investors and credit rating agencies and a potential underpricing of climate risk. Our study contributes to the understanding of transition risks in industrial decarbonization by examining whether carbon intensity is priced in corporate bond markets, a key channel for financing industrial activities. From a regulatory and macroeconomic standpoint, our findings underscore the challenges of pricing climate-related transition risk in corporate credit markets amid shifting US climate policy and largely voluntary, heterogeneous carbon disclosure. Our results suggest that bond investors do not uniformly penalize carbon-intensive firms, instead rewarding firms maintaining strong credit quality despite high carbon intensity. Taken together, our findings reveal divergent carbon-related credit risk assessments across market participants.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Industrial Ecology
Published
2026-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44498-026-00052-w
Primary Topic
Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Carbon intensity disclosure and corporate credit spreads

Florian Kiesel, Christoph Trautmann, Lukas Mueller, Alexander Schoeffel et al.
Journal of Industrial Ecology
Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
article

Carbon intensity disclosure and corporate credit spreads

Florian Kiesel, Christoph Trautmann, Lukas Mueller, Alexander Schoeffel, Dirk Schiereck
article en

Abstract

Abstract We examine the link between carbon intensity and US corporate bond spreads in a sample of disclosing companies before and after 2020. We find a consistent discount among high-intensity companies of approximately 11 bps prior to 2020 compared to companies with median carbon intensity. From 2020 to 2022, the discount increases to 16 basis points for A-rated bonds, while it turns insignificant for BBB-rated bonds. For A-rated bonds, we find an increasing term structure in the carbon discount. Our results imply a discrepancy between the carbon risk perception of bond market investors and credit rating agencies and a potential underpricing of climate risk. Our study contributes to the understanding of transition risks in industrial decarbonization by examining whether carbon intensity is priced in corporate bond markets, a key channel for financing industrial activities. From a regulatory and macroeconomic standpoint, our findings underscore the challenges of pricing climate-related transition risk in corporate credit markets amid shifting US climate policy and largely voluntary, heterogeneous carbon disclosure. Our results suggest that bond investors do not uniformly penalize carbon-intensive firms, instead rewarding firms maintaining strong credit quality despite high carbon intensity. Taken together, our findings reveal divergent carbon-related credit risk assessments across market participants.

Journal of Industrial Ecology
Free University of Bozen-Bolzano (IT), Technische Universität Darmstadt (DE), WHU – Otto Beisheim School of Management (DE)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.