COMPARISON OF THE EFFICACY OF PLASMAPHERESIS AND INTRAVENOUS IMMUNOGLOBULIN IN INFLAMMATORY NEUROPATHIES: A LITERATURE REVIEW

Inflammatory neuropathies, including Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), and multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) are immune-mediated disorders in which immunomodulatory therapy constitutes the cornerstone of treatment. Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) represent the two principal disease-modifying strategies. Although both modalities have demonstrated clinical efficacy, their mechanisms of action, safety profiles, durability of response, and logistical implications differ substantially. This review provides a structured comparative analysis of TPE and IVIG across major inflammatory neuropathies, synthesizing evidence from randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, and international guidelines. In acute GBS, high-quality evidence supports broadly equivalent efficacy between TPE and IVIG in improving disability scores, reducing time to independent ambulation, and shortening mechanical ventilation duration. In CIDP, IVIG is strongly supported for both induction and maintenance therapy, whereas TPE is primarily used for short-term improvement or refractory disease. In MMN, IVIG remains the established first-line therapy, with plasma exchange demonstrating limited benefit. Safety considerations differ between modalities: IVIG is associated mainly with systemic infusion-related and thrombotic risks, whereas TPE carries procedural and vascular access-related complications. Logistical feasibility, infrastructure availability, cost structure, and global immunoglobulin supply constraints further influence therapeutic selection. Despite established efficacy, gaps remain regarding optimal sequencing strategies, long-term comparative outcomes, and biomarker-guided therapy selection. Future prospective and stratified studies are required to refine individualized treatment algorithms and optimize long-term patient outcomes in immune-mediated neuropathies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science
Published
2026-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31435/ijitss.1(49).2026.5132
Primary Topic
Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

COMPARISON OF THE EFFICACY OF PLASMAPHERESIS AND INTRAVENOUS IMMUNOGLOBULIN IN INFLAMMATORY NEUROPATHIES: A LITERATURE REVIEW

Karina Lewandowska, Lena Jaworowicz, Wojciech Janikowski, Agnieszka Jóźwicka et al.
International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science
Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
article

COMPARISON OF THE EFFICACY OF PLASMAPHERESIS AND INTRAVENOUS IMMUNOGLOBULIN IN INFLAMMATORY NEUROPATHIES: A LITERATURE REVIEW

Karina Lewandowska, Lena Jaworowicz, Wojciech Janikowski, Agnieszka Jóźwicka, Maria Wieczorek, Aleksandra Stępka, Weronika Plichtowicz-Kordowska, Ewa Bąkowska
article en

Abstract

Inflammatory neuropathies, including Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), and multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) are immune-mediated disorders in which immunomodulatory therapy constitutes the cornerstone of treatment. Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) represent the two principal disease-modifying strategies. Although both modalities have demonstrated clinical efficacy, their mechanisms of action, safety profiles, durability of response, and logistical implications differ substantially. This review provides a structured comparative analysis of TPE and IVIG across major inflammatory neuropathies, synthesizing evidence from randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, and international guidelines. In acute GBS, high-quality evidence supports broadly equivalent efficacy between TPE and IVIG in improving disability scores, reducing time to independent ambulation, and shortening mechanical ventilation duration. In CIDP, IVIG is strongly supported for both induction and maintenance therapy, whereas TPE is primarily used for short-term improvement or refractory disease. In MMN, IVIG remains the established first-line therapy, with plasma exchange demonstrating limited benefit. Safety considerations differ between modalities: IVIG is associated mainly with systemic infusion-related and thrombotic risks, whereas TPE carries procedural and vascular access-related complications. Logistical feasibility, infrastructure availability, cost structure, and global immunoglobulin supply constraints further influence therapeutic selection. Despite established efficacy, gaps remain regarding optimal sequencing strategies, long-term comparative outcomes, and biomarker-guided therapy selection. Future prospective and stratified studies are required to refine individualized treatment algorithms and optimize long-term patient outcomes in immune-mediated neuropathies.

International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social ScienceVol. 2(1(49))
Medical University of Lublin (PL), Medical University of Warsaw (PL), Central Clinical Hospital (PL)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.