External store safe separation evaluation process implementing the enhanced separation analysis and MIL-HDBK-1763

This paper proposes an enhanced external store safe separation evaluation process that integrates multi-fidelity analysis methods (empirical, CFD, and test data) with criteria from MIL-HDBK-1763 to support the evaluation and compliance of external store separations. Safe separation criteria are reviewed across multiple standards and handbooks, including MIL-HDBK-1763, MIL-HDBK-244A, AGARD-AG-202, and AGARD-AG-300 to tailor appropriate limits for typical aircraft and store configurations. The enhanced separation analysis (ESA) constructs vertical and horizontal safe zones using these multi-fidelity methods. To validate the process, the GBU-31 bomb released from an F-16 aircraft is analyzed. Evaluation criteria are based on airborne weapon compatibility and safety standards. CFD simulations are conducted to predict the trajectory of the GBU-31 under aerodynamic effects caused by the F-16 fuselage, an external fuel tank, and an adjacent AIM-9M missile. The simulations use accurate input derived from wind tunnel experiments and static test data of the ejection unit. The enhanced evaluation identifies motion trends and potential collision risks by tracking critical points on the GBU-31. These critical points must remain within defined vertical and lateral safe boundaries to ensure a collision-free release. The proposed evaluation method proves to be effective and reliable in analyzing complex separation phenomena. It enhances understanding of weapon-aircraft interactions and reduces the need for extensive flight testing during the development of new or upgraded munitions by leveraging tailored criteria and high-fidelity simulations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part G Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Published
2026-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09544100261434441
Primary Topic
Military Defense Systems Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

External store safe separation evaluation process implementing the enhanced separation analysis and MIL-HDBK-1763

Nhu-Van Nguyen, Minh-Hien Dao, Phi-Minh Nguyen, Van-Truong Nguyen et al.
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part G Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Military Defense Systems Analysis
article

External store safe separation evaluation process implementing the enhanced separation analysis and MIL-HDBK-1763

Nhu-Van Nguyen, Minh-Hien Dao, Phi-Minh Nguyen, Van-Truong Nguyen, Quoc-Viet Pham, Thien-Bach Nguyen
article en

Abstract

This paper proposes an enhanced external store safe separation evaluation process that integrates multi-fidelity analysis methods (empirical, CFD, and test data) with criteria from MIL-HDBK-1763 to support the evaluation and compliance of external store separations. Safe separation criteria are reviewed across multiple standards and handbooks, including MIL-HDBK-1763, MIL-HDBK-244A, AGARD-AG-202, and AGARD-AG-300 to tailor appropriate limits for typical aircraft and store configurations. The enhanced separation analysis (ESA) constructs vertical and horizontal safe zones using these multi-fidelity methods. To validate the process, the GBU-31 bomb released from an F-16 aircraft is analyzed. Evaluation criteria are based on airborne weapon compatibility and safety standards. CFD simulations are conducted to predict the trajectory of the GBU-31 under aerodynamic effects caused by the F-16 fuselage, an external fuel tank, and an adjacent AIM-9M missile. The simulations use accurate input derived from wind tunnel experiments and static test data of the ejection unit. The enhanced evaluation identifies motion trends and potential collision risks by tracking critical points on the GBU-31. These critical points must remain within defined vertical and lateral safe boundaries to ensure a collision-free release. The proposed evaluation method proves to be effective and reliable in analyzing complex separation phenomena. It enhances understanding of weapon-aircraft interactions and reduces the need for extensive flight testing during the development of new or upgraded munitions by leveraging tailored criteria and high-fidelity simulations.

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part G Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Aerospace Institute (Germany) (DE)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Military Defense Systems Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.