Comparative effectiveness and underlying mechanisms of acupuncture approaches in IBS-D animal models: a protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis

Irritable bowel syndrome with predominant diarrhea (IBS-D) is a type of functional gastrointestinal disorder mainly marked by abdominal discomfort and frequent loose stools. Its complex pathogenesis involves multiple factors, such as low-grade intestinal inflammation, brain-gut axis dysregulation, and visceral hypersensitivity. Although acupuncture therapies show the potential to alleviate IBS-D symptoms, systematic evidence regarding their comparative efficacy and underlying mechanisms remains lacking. Methods A systematic search will be conducted across eight major databases: CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP, CBM disc, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and CENTRAL. This search will aim to comprehensively collect randomized controlled animal studies on acupuncture therapies for IBS-D. Two independent researchers will extract and record basic study information, characteristics of experimental animals, intervention details, and outcome measures. The primary outcome to be evaluated will be the minimal volume threshold for the abdominal withdrawal reflex (AWR). Secondary outcome measures will include the loose stool rate and levels of biomarkers such as IL-1β, TNF-α, SP, and 5-HT. Data collected will be analyzed utilizing R 4.4.1 and Stata 17.0 software for frequentist network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of various acupuncture treatment options in IBS-D animal models. Standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) will be calculated as the primary effect measure. Treatment rankings will be generated using P-scores, the frequentist analogue of SUCRA. Additional analyses, such as subgroup analysis, sensitivity testing, and meta-regression will be performed. Risk of bias will be evaluated through the SYRCLE risk of bias tool. This study represents the first network meta-analysis integrating indirect and direct evidence from various acupuncture therapies in IBS-D animal models. It aims to provide high-level evidence for optimizing acupuncture therapy selection and clarifying its mechanisms. The network meta-analysis will generate robust preclinical evidence to identify the most effective acupuncture modalities for IBS-D and reveal their underlying mechanisms. The findings will guide future clinical trial design by informing the choice of optimal acupuncture strategies and relevant biological endpoints, thereby promoting the translation of preclinical evidence into clinical practice. Ethics and dissemination Since this is a systematic review and meta-analysis, ethical approval is not deemed necessary. INPLASY registration number INPLASY202470113.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Systematic Reviews
Published
2026-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-026-03162-5
Primary Topic
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative effectiveness and underlying mechanisms of acupuncture approaches in IBS-D animal models: a protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis

Jiahui Yang, Yongjian Liu, Meiyi Zhu, Yuan Fang et al.
Systematic Reviews
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
article

Comparative effectiveness and underlying mechanisms of acupuncture approaches in IBS-D animal models: a protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis

Jiahui Yang, Yongjian Liu, Meiyi Zhu, Yuan Fang, Di Zhang, Tian Zhang, Lun Li, Xiumei Yan, Qinhong Zhang, Jiaqiang Jiang, Fan Jiang, Jia Huang
article en

Abstract

Irritable bowel syndrome with predominant diarrhea (IBS-D) is a type of functional gastrointestinal disorder mainly marked by abdominal discomfort and frequent loose stools. Its complex pathogenesis involves multiple factors, such as low-grade intestinal inflammation, brain-gut axis dysregulation, and visceral hypersensitivity. Although acupuncture therapies show the potential to alleviate IBS-D symptoms, systematic evidence regarding their comparative efficacy and underlying mechanisms remains lacking. Methods A systematic search will be conducted across eight major databases: CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP, CBM disc, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and CENTRAL. This search will aim to comprehensively collect randomized controlled animal studies on acupuncture therapies for IBS-D. Two independent researchers will extract and record basic study information, characteristics of experimental animals, intervention details, and outcome measures. The primary outcome to be evaluated will be the minimal volume threshold for the abdominal withdrawal reflex (AWR). Secondary outcome measures will include the loose stool rate and levels of biomarkers such as IL-1β, TNF-α, SP, and 5-HT. Data collected will be analyzed utilizing R 4.4.1 and Stata 17.0 software for frequentist network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of various acupuncture treatment options in IBS-D animal models. Standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) will be calculated as the primary effect measure. Treatment rankings will be generated using P-scores, the frequentist analogue of SUCRA. Additional analyses, such as subgroup analysis, sensitivity testing, and meta-regression will be performed. Risk of bias will be evaluated through the SYRCLE risk of bias tool. This study represents the first network meta-analysis integrating indirect and direct evidence from various acupuncture therapies in IBS-D animal models. It aims to provide high-level evidence for optimizing acupuncture therapy selection and clarifying its mechanisms. The network meta-analysis will generate robust preclinical evidence to identify the most effective acupuncture modalities for IBS-D and reveal their underlying mechanisms. The findings will guide future clinical trial design by informing the choice of optimal acupuncture strategies and relevant biological endpoints, thereby promoting the translation of preclinical evidence into clinical practice. Ethics and dissemination Since this is a systematic review and meta-analysis, ethical approval is not deemed necessary. INPLASY registration number INPLASY202470113.

Systematic Reviews
Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN), Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine (CN), Jiangxi University of Technology (CN), Affiliated Hospital of Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.