Prediction of acute kidney injury in patients with acute pesticide poisoning using the PKIP score

Acute pesticide poisoning frequently leads to acute kidney injury (AKI), which is strongly associated with increased mortality. However, predictive research in this area remains limited, and criteria for AKI detection in patients with pesticide poisoning are not well-defined. This study aimed to evaluate the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria and develop a model for early AKI prediction in patients with pesticide poisoning. This retrospective study analyzed 877 patients presenting with acute pesticide poisoning between 2015 and 2020. AKI was defined using KDIGO criteria, considering serum creatinine, urine output, and renal replacement therapy initiation. Six machine learning models with four feature selection methods were compared using fivefold cross-validation, stratified by pesticide category. The final model, Prediction of acute Kidney Injury in Pesticide intoxication (PKIP), was established. KDIGO-defined AKI was significantly associated with mortality, with AKI patients showing a 16.6% mortality compared to 4.7% in non-AKI patients. The PKIP model, incorporating 14 features selected via the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator, demonstrated fair discrimination [AUROC 0.720 (95% CI: 0.692-0.747), AUPRC 0.513 (95% CI: 0.464-0.563)]. Furthermore, the model showed prognostic utility for mortality prediction [AUROC 0.839 (95% CI: 0.767-0.910), AUPRC 0.421 (95% CI: 0.246-0.595)]. At the predefined cutoff value of 0.420, the model achieved a sensitivity of 39.0% and a specificity of 89.7%. Risk stratification based on PKIP probabilities showed significant differences in outcomes between groups. The high-risk group demonstrated significantly higher risks of AKI occurrence, progression to higher AKI stages, and mortality compared to the low-risk group. PKIP exhibited superior risk stratification for both AKI and mortality prediction compared to the APACHE II score. This study validates the use of KDIGO criteria for AKI detection in pesticide poisoning and introduces the PKIP model as a tool demonstrating moderate discrimination for early AKI prediction and risk stratification. The web-based PKIP tool can serve as a practical instrument for clinical decision-making for patients with pesticide poisoning. Future research should focus on external validation of the PKIP model and assessment of its impact on patient outcomes in diverse clinical settings.Trial registration: Retrospectively registered.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-41334-4
Primary Topic
Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prediction of acute kidney injury in patients with acute pesticide poisoning using the PKIP score

Namjun Cho, Samuel K. Park, Youngchang Kim, D. Lee et al.
Scientific Reports
Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity
article

Prediction of acute kidney injury in patients with acute pesticide poisoning using the PKIP score

Namjun Cho, Samuel K. Park, Youngchang Kim, D. Lee, Se-Jin Ahn, Eun Young Lee, Inyong Jeong, Hyo-Wook Gil, Hwamin Lee, Bomi Choi
article en

Abstract

Acute pesticide poisoning frequently leads to acute kidney injury (AKI), which is strongly associated with increased mortality. However, predictive research in this area remains limited, and criteria for AKI detection in patients with pesticide poisoning are not well-defined. This study aimed to evaluate the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria and develop a model for early AKI prediction in patients with pesticide poisoning. This retrospective study analyzed 877 patients presenting with acute pesticide poisoning between 2015 and 2020. AKI was defined using KDIGO criteria, considering serum creatinine, urine output, and renal replacement therapy initiation. Six machine learning models with four feature selection methods were compared using fivefold cross-validation, stratified by pesticide category. The final model, Prediction of acute Kidney Injury in Pesticide intoxication (PKIP), was established. KDIGO-defined AKI was significantly associated with mortality, with AKI patients showing a 16.6% mortality compared to 4.7% in non-AKI patients. The PKIP model, incorporating 14 features selected via the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator, demonstrated fair discrimination [AUROC 0.720 (95% CI: 0.692-0.747), AUPRC 0.513 (95% CI: 0.464-0.563)]. Furthermore, the model showed prognostic utility for mortality prediction [AUROC 0.839 (95% CI: 0.767-0.910), AUPRC 0.421 (95% CI: 0.246-0.595)]. At the predefined cutoff value of 0.420, the model achieved a sensitivity of 39.0% and a specificity of 89.7%. Risk stratification based on PKIP probabilities showed significant differences in outcomes between groups. The high-risk group demonstrated significantly higher risks of AKI occurrence, progression to higher AKI stages, and mortality compared to the low-risk group. PKIP exhibited superior risk stratification for both AKI and mortality prediction compared to the APACHE II score. This study validates the use of KDIGO criteria for AKI detection in pesticide poisoning and introduces the PKIP model as a tool demonstrating moderate discrimination for early AKI prediction and risk stratification. The web-based PKIP tool can serve as a practical instrument for clinical decision-making for patients with pesticide poisoning. Future research should focus on external validation of the PKIP model and assessment of its impact on patient outcomes in diverse clinical settings.Trial registration: Retrospectively registered.

Scientific Reports
Korea University (KR), Soonchunhyang University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.