Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes Among Women of Advanced Maternal Age: A Retrospective Cohort Study at a Tertiary Hospital

Objectives This study aimed to characterise the sociodemographic profile of women aged ≥ 35 years (advanced maternal age [AMA]) delivering at Sultan Qaboos University Hospital and to compare obstetric and neonatal outcomes with mothers aged < 35 years over a one‐year period. Methods A retrospective cohort of 452 singleton deliveries from January to December 2023 was analysed. Participants were classified as AMA ( n = 226) and non‐AMA ( n = 226). Pregnancies with preexisting chronic hypertension or diabetes, systemic lupus erythematosus, in vitro fertilisation or multiple gestations were excluded. Data were retrieved from electronic medical records. Categorical variables were compared using chi‐squared or Fisher’s exact tests and continuous variables with t ‐tests. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05 (two‐tailed). Prespecified outcomes included antenatal complications (e.g., gestational diabetes), intrapartum events (mode of delivery, preterm birth), postpartum haemorrhage, foetal growth restriction and neonatal measures (birth weight, Apgar scores at 1 and 5 min). Results Compared with non‐AMA mothers, AMA was associated with higher rates of gestational diabetes (50.9% vs. 38.5%; p = 0.011), preterm birth (40.7% vs. 27.9%; p = 0.005), postpartum haemorrhage (8.4% vs. 2.7%; p = 0.012) and caesarean delivery ( p < 0.001). Foetal growth restriction occurred less often in AMA than in non‐AMA (5.8% vs. 9.3%; p = 0.211). Neonatal outcomes, including mean birth weight and Apgar scores, were broadly comparable between groups, with no statistically significant differences observed. Conclusion In this tertiary‐care cohort, AMA was associated with increased risks of gestational diabetes, preterm birth, postpartum haemorrhage and caesarean delivery, whereas neonatal outcomes did not differ materially by age group. These findings support vigilant antenatal surveillance, optimisation of modifiable risk factors and individualised intrapartum planning for AMA pregnancies. The results add region‐specific evidence from Oman and may inform counselling regarding risks and monitoring strategies for women planning pregnancy at AMA.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Obstetrics and Gynecology International
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1155/ogi/4046855
Primary Topic
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes Among Women of Advanced Maternal Age: A Retrospective Cohort Study at a Tertiary Hospital

Hana Harib Al Sumri, Fathma Al Shibly, Nada Salih, Ahood Alrashdi et al.
Obstetrics and Gynecology International
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
article

Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes Among Women of Advanced Maternal Age: A Retrospective Cohort Study at a Tertiary Hospital

Hana Harib Al Sumri, Fathma Al Shibly, Nada Salih, Ahood Alrashdi, Sara Albarwani
article en

Abstract

Objectives This study aimed to characterise the sociodemographic profile of women aged ≥ 35 years (advanced maternal age [AMA]) delivering at Sultan Qaboos University Hospital and to compare obstetric and neonatal outcomes with mothers aged < 35 years over a one‐year period. Methods A retrospective cohort of 452 singleton deliveries from January to December 2023 was analysed. Participants were classified as AMA ( n = 226) and non‐AMA ( n = 226). Pregnancies with preexisting chronic hypertension or diabetes, systemic lupus erythematosus, in vitro fertilisation or multiple gestations were excluded. Data were retrieved from electronic medical records. Categorical variables were compared using chi‐squared or Fisher’s exact tests and continuous variables with t ‐tests. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05 (two‐tailed). Prespecified outcomes included antenatal complications (e.g., gestational diabetes), intrapartum events (mode of delivery, preterm birth), postpartum haemorrhage, foetal growth restriction and neonatal measures (birth weight, Apgar scores at 1 and 5 min). Results Compared with non‐AMA mothers, AMA was associated with higher rates of gestational diabetes (50.9% vs. 38.5%; p = 0.011), preterm birth (40.7% vs. 27.9%; p = 0.005), postpartum haemorrhage (8.4% vs. 2.7%; p = 0.012) and caesarean delivery ( p < 0.001). Foetal growth restriction occurred less often in AMA than in non‐AMA (5.8% vs. 9.3%; p = 0.211). Neonatal outcomes, including mean birth weight and Apgar scores, were broadly comparable between groups, with no statistically significant differences observed. Conclusion In this tertiary‐care cohort, AMA was associated with increased risks of gestational diabetes, preterm birth, postpartum haemorrhage and caesarean delivery, whereas neonatal outcomes did not differ materially by age group. These findings support vigilant antenatal surveillance, optimisation of modifiable risk factors and individualised intrapartum planning for AMA pregnancies. The results add region‐specific evidence from Oman and may inform counselling regarding risks and monitoring strategies for women planning pregnancy at AMA.

Obstetrics and Gynecology InternationalVol. 2026(1)
National University of Science and Technology (ZW), Sultan Qaboos University Hospital (OM), Sultan Qaboos University (OM)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.