Language, dictionaries and society: the (re)presentation of LGBTQ individuals in Oxford online English dictionaries

Drawing on the framework of Critical Lexicographical Discourse Studies, this research examines how LGBTQ individuals are (re)presented in the Oxford online English dictionaries (OOEDs) through an analysis of LGBTQ slang terms and their accompanying examples within the dictionaries. The findings reveal that while OOEDs strive for descriptiveness by including a substantial number of LGBTQ slang terms, they also impose prescriptive constraints on users through selective inclusion, definition, and markedness. In their representation of LGBTQ individuals, OOEDs attempt to mitigate societal prejudice by incorporating inclusive markers such as ‘LGBT+’, gender-neutral pronouns like ‘they’, and neutral binary gender classifications such as ‘queer males and females’. However, they simultaneously perpetuate gender bias, which is evident in the use of binary gender pronouns, and reinforce hierarchical power dynamics both within and among LGBTQ groups. This study posits that, influenced by the dual pressures of linguistic realities and political correctness, online dictionary writers bear the responsibility of shaping social values while navigating the delicate balance between descriptive and prescriptive content presentation, as well as between challenging and reinforcing societal ideologies and power relations. The study sheds light on the interplay between language, dictionaries and society.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2026-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-07056-8
Primary Topic
Lexicography and Language Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Language, dictionaries and society: the (re)presentation of LGBTQ individuals in Oxford online English dictionaries

Xinli Xu, Wenge Chen
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Lexicography and Language Studies
article

Language, dictionaries and society: the (re)presentation of LGBTQ individuals in Oxford online English dictionaries

Xinli Xu, Wenge Chen
article en

Abstract

Drawing on the framework of Critical Lexicographical Discourse Studies, this research examines how LGBTQ individuals are (re)presented in the Oxford online English dictionaries (OOEDs) through an analysis of LGBTQ slang terms and their accompanying examples within the dictionaries. The findings reveal that while OOEDs strive for descriptiveness by including a substantial number of LGBTQ slang terms, they also impose prescriptive constraints on users through selective inclusion, definition, and markedness. In their representation of LGBTQ individuals, OOEDs attempt to mitigate societal prejudice by incorporating inclusive markers such as ‘LGBT+’, gender-neutral pronouns like ‘they’, and neutral binary gender classifications such as ‘queer males and females’. However, they simultaneously perpetuate gender bias, which is evident in the use of binary gender pronouns, and reinforce hierarchical power dynamics both within and among LGBTQ groups. This study posits that, influenced by the dual pressures of linguistic realities and political correctness, online dictionary writers bear the responsibility of shaping social values while navigating the delicate balance between descriptive and prescriptive content presentation, as well as between challenging and reinforcing societal ideologies and power relations. The study sheds light on the interplay between language, dictionaries and society.

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Huaqiao University (CN)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Lexicography and Language Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.