A Philosophical Reflection on Sustainable Bioeconomy Systems Globally Orchestrated and Territorially Self-Organized

Major concerns exist about the provision of sufficient renewable resources for nourishing as first primary need, clothing, living, travelling, working and leisuring for all generations, everywhere and anytime, while preserving nature’s biodiversity. This requires a balanced view on bioeconomy, of which food accounts for more than 50%, as the ‘economisation of nature’ and the ‘ecologisation of the economy’. Globally, a new way of anthropocentric orchestration and governance is needed that allow the global bioeconomy system to adaptively and endlessly balance between the planetary and universal societal boundaries. The precautionary principle ‘protecting life on earth and its atmosphere’ – thanks to a biocentric or natural evolution – should then be respected to reach sustainability. The global bioeconomy system is holistically built up by territorially-bounded bioeconomy systems, continuously interacting, adapting and learning from a process philosophy perspective. Following logical reasoning these systems are territorialized complex adaptive systems (CAS). This allows self-organising, naturally evolving processes, and exchanging (im-)material assets in a balanced manner. The number of territorialized bioeconomy systems is hard to estimate. If power laws for CAS also hold for bioeconomy systems, and if the power is ½ (i.e. the square root), then the approximate number of territorialized systems will be 100.000 in case of 10 billion people, and 6 billion different species globally. This evokes philosophical questions about autonomy, interconnections, diversity, ethics, governance and, hence, the nature of sustainability itself. Our reasoning converges towards a new definition: ‘Sustainable Bioeconomy Systems self-organize themselves at territorialized level and are globally governed between planetary and universal societal boundaries while providing food, bio-based materials and bioenergy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Food Ethics
Published
2026-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41055-026-00212-5
Primary Topic
Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Philosophical Reflection on Sustainable Bioeconomy Systems Globally Orchestrated and Territorially Self-Organized

Mechthild Donner, Hugo de Vries
Food Ethics
Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
article

A Philosophical Reflection on Sustainable Bioeconomy Systems Globally Orchestrated and Territorially Self-Organized

Mechthild Donner, Hugo de Vries
article en

Abstract

Major concerns exist about the provision of sufficient renewable resources for nourishing as first primary need, clothing, living, travelling, working and leisuring for all generations, everywhere and anytime, while preserving nature’s biodiversity. This requires a balanced view on bioeconomy, of which food accounts for more than 50%, as the ‘economisation of nature’ and the ‘ecologisation of the economy’. Globally, a new way of anthropocentric orchestration and governance is needed that allow the global bioeconomy system to adaptively and endlessly balance between the planetary and universal societal boundaries. The precautionary principle ‘protecting life on earth and its atmosphere’ – thanks to a biocentric or natural evolution – should then be respected to reach sustainability. The global bioeconomy system is holistically built up by territorially-bounded bioeconomy systems, continuously interacting, adapting and learning from a process philosophy perspective. Following logical reasoning these systems are territorialized complex adaptive systems (CAS). This allows self-organising, naturally evolving processes, and exchanging (im-)material assets in a balanced manner. The number of territorialized bioeconomy systems is hard to estimate. If power laws for CAS also hold for bioeconomy systems, and if the power is ½ (i.e. the square root), then the approximate number of territorialized systems will be 100.000 in case of 10 billion people, and 6 billion different species globally. This evokes philosophical questions about autonomy, interconnections, diversity, ethics, governance and, hence, the nature of sustainability itself. Our reasoning converges towards a new definition: ‘Sustainable Bioeconomy Systems self-organize themselves at territorialized level and are globally governed between planetary and universal societal boundaries while providing food, bio-based materials and bioenergy.

Food EthicsVol. 11(1)
Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (FR), Ingénierie des Agropolymères et Technologies Emergentes (FR), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Institut Agronomique Méditerranéen de Montpellier (FR), Montpellier Interdisciplinary center on Sustainable Agri-food systems: social and nutritional sciences (FR), Institut Agro Montpelier (FR), Services déconcentrés d'appui à la recherche Occitanie-Montpellier (FR), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (FR)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.