Evolution of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures After Surgery for Degenerative Cervical Spine Disease: Do 1-year PROMs Reflect Longer Term Outcomes?

Background and objectives: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are today's gold standard outcomes in surgery for degenerative cervical spine disorders. Long-term outcome research may be limited by missing data at later follow-up time-points. Previous studies on lumbar disorders suggest that no significant changes to PROMS occur after 1-year postsurgery. However, no previous study has examined the evolution of PROMS after surgery for degenerative cervical spine disease. We hence aimed to study the evolution of PROMs at 1, 2, and 5 years of postoperative follow-up in patients with cervical spondylosis treated for degenerative radiculopathy or myelopathy. Methods: A total of 6467 patients (4785 radiculopathy and 1682 myelopathy) undergoing surgery for cervical spondylosis between 2006 and 2018 in Sweden were included. Prerequisites for inclusion were PROMs at 1 and 2 or 5 years. The evolution of PROMs over time, the correlation between 1-year PROMs and 2- or 5-year PROMs and the predictive capability of 1-year PROMs were assessed. Conclusions: After surgery for cervical spondylosis with either degenerative radiculopathy or myelopathy, PROMs remained stable beyond 1 year, with minimal changes occurring thereafter. 1-year PROMs correlated with and served as a good proxy for predicting 2- and 5-year PROMs. This suggests that on a population level, 1-year PROMs are sufficient to assess longer term outcomes.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Universität Zürich, ZORA
Published
2025-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-293106
Primary Topic
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evolution of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures After Surgery for Degenerative Cervical Spine Disease: Do 1-year PROMs Reflect Longer Term Outcomes?

Victor E. Staartjes, Erik Edström, Cecilia Kjaerbeck, Adrian Elmi-Terander et al.
Universität Zürich, ZORA
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
article

Evolution of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures After Surgery for Degenerative Cervical Spine Disease: Do 1-year PROMs Reflect Longer Term Outcomes?

Victor E. Staartjes, Erik Edström, Cecilia Kjaerbeck, Adrian Elmi-Terander, Victor Gabriel El-Hajj
article en

Abstract

Background and objectives: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are today's gold standard outcomes in surgery for degenerative cervical spine disorders. Long-term outcome research may be limited by missing data at later follow-up time-points. Previous studies on lumbar disorders suggest that no significant changes to PROMS occur after 1-year postsurgery. However, no previous study has examined the evolution of PROMS after surgery for degenerative cervical spine disease. We hence aimed to study the evolution of PROMs at 1, 2, and 5 years of postoperative follow-up in patients with cervical spondylosis treated for degenerative radiculopathy or myelopathy. Methods: A total of 6467 patients (4785 radiculopathy and 1682 myelopathy) undergoing surgery for cervical spondylosis between 2006 and 2018 in Sweden were included. Prerequisites for inclusion were PROMs at 1 and 2 or 5 years. The evolution of PROMs over time, the correlation between 1-year PROMs and 2- or 5-year PROMs and the predictive capability of 1-year PROMs were assessed. Conclusions: After surgery for cervical spondylosis with either degenerative radiculopathy or myelopathy, PROMs remained stable beyond 1 year, with minimal changes occurring thereafter. 1-year PROMs correlated with and served as a good proxy for predicting 2- and 5-year PROMs. This suggests that on a population level, 1-year PROMs are sufficient to assess longer term outcomes.

Universität Zürich, ZORA
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.