The weakness of anti-Christian nationalism: when religiously inclusive orientations can’t increase tolerance

Abstract Efforts to counter Christian nationalism focus on the power of ideas—that Christian nationalism is historically inaccurate, religiously heretical, or even fascist. Those efforts build upon a vast research agenda on Christian nationalism in the social sciences to argue, at least implicitly, that a Christian nationalist worldview rejects religious, racial, and political pluralism in favor of a (white) Christian-centric goal for the United States. But they may be wrong on at least one account. In a January 2024 survey of 1,500 American Christians, we piloted “anti-Christian nationalism” measures, expecting to find a robust negative relationship with established measures of Christian nationalism. Instead, we find that many Christian nationalists already hold pluralist ideas in their heads. We then explore whether anti-Christian nationalism can work to counter, moderate, or align attitudes with Christian nationalism on political tolerance. We find that Christian nationalism often overrules anti-Christian nationalism, especially when the threat is high.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
NPL report DEM-TQD
Published
2026-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1755048326100285
Primary Topic
Religion and Society Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The weakness of anti-Christian nationalism: when religiously inclusive orientations can’t increase tolerance

Paul A. Djupe, Brooklyn Walker
NPL report DEM-TQD
Religion and Society Interactions
article

The weakness of anti-Christian nationalism: when religiously inclusive orientations can’t increase tolerance

Paul A. Djupe, Brooklyn Walker
article en

Abstract

Abstract Efforts to counter Christian nationalism focus on the power of ideas—that Christian nationalism is historically inaccurate, religiously heretical, or even fascist. Those efforts build upon a vast research agenda on Christian nationalism in the social sciences to argue, at least implicitly, that a Christian nationalist worldview rejects religious, racial, and political pluralism in favor of a (white) Christian-centric goal for the United States. But they may be wrong on at least one account. In a January 2024 survey of 1,500 American Christians, we piloted “anti-Christian nationalism” measures, expecting to find a robust negative relationship with established measures of Christian nationalism. Instead, we find that many Christian nationalists already hold pluralist ideas in their heads. We then explore whether anti-Christian nationalism can work to counter, moderate, or align attitudes with Christian nationalism on political tolerance. We find that Christian nationalism often overrules anti-Christian nationalism, especially when the threat is high.

NPL report DEM-TQDVol. 19(1)
Denison University (US), University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Religion and Society Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The weakness of anti-Christian nationalism: when religiously inclusive orientations can’t increase tolerance — Paul A. Djupe, Brooklyn Walker · NPL report DEM-TQD (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS