Knowledge Assessment on the Management of Acute Cor Pulmonale: An Interdisciplinary Survey Study

Background/Objectives: Acute cor pulmonale is a critical clinical condition often encountered in acute care settings. Optimal management demands coordinated, interdisciplinary care. The aim of this study was to assess the current knowledge and management strategies for acute cor pulmonale among different groups of physicians involved in acute care in Switzerland. Methods: A structured questionnaire, extrapolated from the Acute Cardiovascular Care Association of the European Society of Cardiology clinical consensus statement on the diagnosis and treatment of cor pulmonale, was distributed among physicians of four specialties. Results: A total of 110 physicians participated in this multicenter survey, including 15 “experts,” 71 “generalists” (internal and emergency medicine), and 24 “specialists” (cardiology and intensive care). Experts validated 29 out of 40 questionnaire items (Fleiss Kappa 0.63), which were then used for analysis. Overall, there was substantial agreement with the experts’ answers among non-experts, with most correct response rates exceeding 60%. Significant differences were observed for only two items: experts more frequently recognized the prognostic value of clinical models (87% vs. 59%, p = 0.046) and the correct indications for systemic thrombolysis (100% vs. 76%, p = 0.037). Between generalists and specialists, differences in knowledge were minimal. Specialists more accurately identified the role of repeated arterial blood gas analysis, while generalists showed better awareness of clinical prognostic models. Conclusions: The study highlights a sound knowledge of acute cor pulmonale among acute care physicians, regardless of specialty. Despite comparable levels of knowledge, some variations reflect their clinical roles and information sources. The results emphasize the value of existing educational efforts and support the need for comprehensive, accessible guidelines to standardize care in complex conditions like acute cor pulmonale.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15072527
Primary Topic
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Knowledge Assessment on the Management of Acute Cor Pulmonale: An Interdisciplinary Survey Study

Levin Bolt, Alain Rudiger, LC Huber, Mattia Arrigo et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
article

Knowledge Assessment on the Management of Acute Cor Pulmonale: An Interdisciplinary Survey Study

Levin Bolt, Alain Rudiger, LC Huber, Mattia Arrigo, Alexander Turk
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Acute cor pulmonale is a critical clinical condition often encountered in acute care settings. Optimal management demands coordinated, interdisciplinary care. The aim of this study was to assess the current knowledge and management strategies for acute cor pulmonale among different groups of physicians involved in acute care in Switzerland. Methods: A structured questionnaire, extrapolated from the Acute Cardiovascular Care Association of the European Society of Cardiology clinical consensus statement on the diagnosis and treatment of cor pulmonale, was distributed among physicians of four specialties. Results: A total of 110 physicians participated in this multicenter survey, including 15 “experts,” 71 “generalists” (internal and emergency medicine), and 24 “specialists” (cardiology and intensive care). Experts validated 29 out of 40 questionnaire items (Fleiss Kappa 0.63), which were then used for analysis. Overall, there was substantial agreement with the experts’ answers among non-experts, with most correct response rates exceeding 60%. Significant differences were observed for only two items: experts more frequently recognized the prognostic value of clinical models (87% vs. 59%, p = 0.046) and the correct indications for systemic thrombolysis (100% vs. 76%, p = 0.037). Between generalists and specialists, differences in knowledge were minimal. Specialists more accurately identified the role of repeated arterial blood gas analysis, while generalists showed better awareness of clinical prognostic models. Conclusions: The study highlights a sound knowledge of acute cor pulmonale among acute care physicians, regardless of specialty. Despite comparable levels of knowledge, some variations reflect their clinical roles and information sources. The results emphasize the value of existing educational efforts and support the need for comprehensive, accessible guidelines to standardize care in complex conditions like acute cor pulmonale.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(7)
University of Zurich (CH), Triemli Hospital (CH), Ospedale regionale di Lugano (CH), University Hospital of Zurich (CH), See-Spital (CH), Spital Limmattal (CH), Università della Svizzera italiana (CH)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.