AXECC: Benchmarking the Privacy and Accessibility Impact of Browser Extensions

Browser extensions are commonly used to improve the browsing experience and accessibility. However, installing extensions naturally increases the user’s risk. This work presents AXECC , a novel framework for measuring the impact of web tracking and accessibility. The AXECC framework includes static, dynamic, and accessibility analyses across multiple web pages. We utilise the AXECC framework to analyse the web tracking and accessibility impact in the wild on 21k real-world extensions collected from the Chrome Web Store. In our analysis, we identify that 15.97% of extensions (with more than 600M users) perform a type of third–party tracking in the first 60 seconds after loading. These results are highly correlated with the extension category and are consistent across different web pages. Furthermore, we find that a small number of extensions (with 65M users) alter the accessibility of a web page when browsing, and these alterations are often complex and involve more tracking. Our work reveals a significant privacy risk from web tracking within popular browser extensions, often intertwined with complex accessibility alterations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACM Transactions on Privacy and Security
Published
2026-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3805701
Primary Topic
Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AXECC: Benchmarking the Privacy and Accessibility Impact of Browser Extensions

Maryam Mehrnezhad, Ehsan Toreini, J Clarke
ACM Transactions on Privacy and Security
Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
article

AXECC: Benchmarking the Privacy and Accessibility Impact of Browser Extensions

Maryam Mehrnezhad, Ehsan Toreini, J Clarke
article en

Abstract

Browser extensions are commonly used to improve the browsing experience and accessibility. However, installing extensions naturally increases the user’s risk. This work presents AXECC , a novel framework for measuring the impact of web tracking and accessibility. The AXECC framework includes static, dynamic, and accessibility analyses across multiple web pages. We utilise the AXECC framework to analyse the web tracking and accessibility impact in the wild on 21k real-world extensions collected from the Chrome Web Store. In our analysis, we identify that 15.97% of extensions (with more than 600M users) perform a type of third–party tracking in the first 60 seconds after loading. These results are highly correlated with the extension category and are consistent across different web pages. Furthermore, we find that a small number of extensions (with 65M users) alter the accessibility of a web page when browsing, and these alterations are often complex and involve more tracking. Our work reveals a significant privacy risk from web tracking within popular browser extensions, often intertwined with complex accessibility alterations.

ACM Transactions on Privacy and Security
Royal Holloway University of London (GB), University of Surrey (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.