Effectiveness of educational video versus standard verbal instruction on midstream urine collection among elective urology patients: a randomized controlled trial

Accurate midstream urine (MSU) collection is essential to minimise contamination and support correct diagnosis of urinary tract infection, yet contamination remains common despite routine verbal instruction. Persistent contamination can cause misdiagnosis, unnecessary antibiotics and delays before endourological procedures. This trial evaluated whether an educational video improves MSU collection compared with standard verbal instruction among elective urology patients. This prospective randomised controlled trial included adults admitted for elective urology surgery at a tertiary public hospital in Selangor, Malaysia (21 January–31 March 2025). Eligible patients (> 18 years, any sex, able to consent, English or Malay-speaking) were randomised 1:1 to standard verbal or educational video instruction on MSU collection. All participants completed a pre-intervention questionnaire, collected two urine samples (urinalysis and culture), and then completed a post-collection questionnaire. The primary outcome was urine sample contamination, defined as mixed growth of > 2 species or growth of typical skin/perineal/vaginal flora. Secondary outcomes were urinalysis indices, participant-reported knowledge and satisfaction, and a six-step correct practice score (0–6). Categorical outcomes were compared using Pearson’s chi-square tests; practice scores were compared using the Mann–Whitney U test. A total of 150 patients were randomised (75 per group; mean age 56.6 ± 13.8 years; 74.7% with comorbidities). Contamination was lower in the video than verbal group (24.0% vs. 38.7%; χ²=3.75, P = 0.053). Participants with diabetes had higher contamination than those without (42.9% vs. 24.5%; P = 0.019). Correct practice was high overall, but 88.0% of the video group versus 76.0% of the verbal group achieved a perfect score of 6; median (IQR) was 6.0 (0.0) in both groups, with a significant difference favouring video (z = − 2.101, P = 0.036). Educational video instruction improved adherence to correct MSU collection steps and showed a non-significant trend towards reduced contamination compared with standard verbal instruction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
African Journal of Urology
Published
2026-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12301-026-00557-7
Primary Topic
Urinary Tract Infections Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effectiveness of educational video versus standard verbal instruction on midstream urine collection among elective urology patients: a randomized controlled trial

Gautham Suppiah, Charng Chee Toh, Ju Fan Tay, Shiraz Firdaus SaifulBahri et al.
African Journal of Urology
Urinary Tract Infections Management
article

Effectiveness of educational video versus standard verbal instruction on midstream urine collection among elective urology patients: a randomized controlled trial

Gautham Suppiah, Charng Chee Toh, Ju Fan Tay, Shiraz Firdaus SaifulBahri, Christopher Zi Wei Liu, Kevin Yue Wei Chang, Mohamed Esmail Abdul Azeez, Maizatul Aisah Adnan, Adrian Li-Siang Satish
article en

Abstract

Accurate midstream urine (MSU) collection is essential to minimise contamination and support correct diagnosis of urinary tract infection, yet contamination remains common despite routine verbal instruction. Persistent contamination can cause misdiagnosis, unnecessary antibiotics and delays before endourological procedures. This trial evaluated whether an educational video improves MSU collection compared with standard verbal instruction among elective urology patients. This prospective randomised controlled trial included adults admitted for elective urology surgery at a tertiary public hospital in Selangor, Malaysia (21 January–31 March 2025). Eligible patients (> 18 years, any sex, able to consent, English or Malay-speaking) were randomised 1:1 to standard verbal or educational video instruction on MSU collection. All participants completed a pre-intervention questionnaire, collected two urine samples (urinalysis and culture), and then completed a post-collection questionnaire. The primary outcome was urine sample contamination, defined as mixed growth of > 2 species or growth of typical skin/perineal/vaginal flora. Secondary outcomes were urinalysis indices, participant-reported knowledge and satisfaction, and a six-step correct practice score (0–6). Categorical outcomes were compared using Pearson’s chi-square tests; practice scores were compared using the Mann–Whitney U test. A total of 150 patients were randomised (75 per group; mean age 56.6 ± 13.8 years; 74.7% with comorbidities). Contamination was lower in the video than verbal group (24.0% vs. 38.7%; χ²=3.75, P = 0.053). Participants with diabetes had higher contamination than those without (42.9% vs. 24.5%; P = 0.019). Correct practice was high overall, but 88.0% of the video group versus 76.0% of the verbal group achieved a perfect score of 6; median (IQR) was 6.0 (0.0) in both groups, with a significant difference favouring video (z = − 2.101, P = 0.036). Educational video instruction improved adherence to correct MSU collection steps and showed a non-significant trend towards reduced contamination compared with standard verbal instruction.

African Journal of UrologyVol. 32(1)
Hospital Selayang (MY), UC Irvine Health (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Urinary Tract Infections Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.