Causal Estimates of Multidimensional Well-being Under Hypothetical Forgiveness Shift Scenarios: Longitudinal Evidence From a National Panel in New Zealand

Forgiveness has been identified as a potential public health resource, but how might average well-being change if forgiveness were higher across the population? In this three-wave longitudinal study (Wave 1: 2018/2019 [T0], Wave 2: 2019/2020 [T1], Wave 3: 2020/2021 [T2]) with a nationally representative sample of New Zealanders ( N = 47928), we explore this question by investigating the potential causal effects of two hypothetical forgiveness shift scenarios on 23 indicators of physical health and health behavior, embodied well-being, ego-related well-being, reflective well-being, and social well-being approximately one year later. Using Targeted Learning within an outcome-wide analytic framework, we modeled (1) a targeted shift scenario in which those with below-average forgiveness were shifted to the average, and (2) a population-wide shift scenario in which all individuals were shifted up by one point on a 1-7 response scale for forgiveness. There was reliable evidence of better well-being on a majority of outcomes for both shift scenarios (individual-level average effects were generally very small), although effects were slightly stronger for the population-wide shift scenario. Effect sizes were generally stronger and more consistent for outcomes on psychosocial domains (e.g., reflective well-being) compared to physical health and health behavior. These findings suggest that widespread increases in forgiveness within a population, whether targeted to those low in forgiveness or promoted generally, may contribute to improving population well-being if forgiveness resources can be disseminated with broad reach and uptake at relatively low cost. • Outcome-wide causal analysis estimated well-being effects under two policy-like forgiveness shift scenarios. • Hypothetical shift scenarios raised low forgiveness or shifted the whole distribution upward. • Both shifts yielded very small average improvements in a majority of the 23 outcomes. • Population impact may be possible if forgiveness resources can be scaled at relatively low cost with broad reach and uptake. • Promising scalable options include self-directed workbooks and community forgiveness campaigns.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SSM - Mental Health
Published
2026-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmmh.2026.100619
Primary Topic
Forgiveness and Related Behaviors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Causal Estimates of Multidimensional Well-being Under Hypothetical Forgiveness Shift Scenarios: Longitudinal Evidence From a National Panel in New Zealand

Joseph Bulbulia, Pedro Antonio de la Rosa, Richard G. Cowden, Don E. Davis et al.
SSM - Mental Health
Forgiveness and Related Behaviors
article

Causal Estimates of Multidimensional Well-being Under Hypothetical Forgiveness Shift Scenarios: Longitudinal Evidence From a National Panel in New Zealand

Joseph Bulbulia, Pedro Antonio de la Rosa, Richard G. Cowden, Don E. Davis, Tyler J. VanderWeele, Eric N. Fung, Everett L. Worthington, Chris G. Sibley
article en

Abstract

Forgiveness has been identified as a potential public health resource, but how might average well-being change if forgiveness were higher across the population? In this three-wave longitudinal study (Wave 1: 2018/2019 [T0], Wave 2: 2019/2020 [T1], Wave 3: 2020/2021 [T2]) with a nationally representative sample of New Zealanders ( N = 47928), we explore this question by investigating the potential causal effects of two hypothetical forgiveness shift scenarios on 23 indicators of physical health and health behavior, embodied well-being, ego-related well-being, reflective well-being, and social well-being approximately one year later. Using Targeted Learning within an outcome-wide analytic framework, we modeled (1) a targeted shift scenario in which those with below-average forgiveness were shifted to the average, and (2) a population-wide shift scenario in which all individuals were shifted up by one point on a 1-7 response scale for forgiveness. There was reliable evidence of better well-being on a majority of outcomes for both shift scenarios (individual-level average effects were generally very small), although effects were slightly stronger for the population-wide shift scenario. Effect sizes were generally stronger and more consistent for outcomes on psychosocial domains (e.g., reflective well-being) compared to physical health and health behavior. These findings suggest that widespread increases in forgiveness within a population, whether targeted to those low in forgiveness or promoted generally, may contribute to improving population well-being if forgiveness resources can be disseminated with broad reach and uptake at relatively low cost. • Outcome-wide causal analysis estimated well-being effects under two policy-like forgiveness shift scenarios. • Hypothetical shift scenarios raised low forgiveness or shifted the whole distribution upward. • Both shifts yielded very small average improvements in a majority of the 23 outcomes. • Population impact may be possible if forgiveness resources can be scaled at relatively low cost with broad reach and uptake. • Promising scalable options include self-directed workbooks and community forgiveness campaigns.

SSM - Mental Health
Georgia Department of Education (US), Harvard University (US), University of Auckland (NZ), Georgia State University (US), Virginia Commonwealth University (US), Victoria University of Wellington (NZ), Quantitative BioSciences (US), Universidad de Navarra (ES)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Forgiveness and Related Behaviors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.