Prefabrication in construction: a pathway to improved mental health and well-being for workers
Purpose Premised on the Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) model, this study is designed to assess the suitability of prefabrication for enhancing mental health and well-being supportive work environment for construction workers. Design/methodology/approach Ninety-four Australian construction workers on either prefabrication or traditional in-situ construction projects were surveyed. Mental health stressors were factor-analysed to reduce them into industry-related, management/organisational, physical health and safety and personal stressors before being further analysed with partial least squares-structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM). Differences between the traditional and prefabrication models were assessed with multi-group analysis (MGA). Findings The PLS-SEM analysis revealed a significant positive influence of prefabrication (PB) on all measures of well-being except cultural/religious well-being in the prefabrication model. PB also showed significant inverse effects on industry-related stressors (IRS) in the prefabrication model. Furthermore, PB has mediated inverse impact on management/organisational and physical health and safety stressors. The results confirmed well-executed prefabrication as a job resource and its capability to alleviate some construction-specific stressors and improve workers' well-being through better process standardisation and conducive work environment. Originality/value The study concluded by recommending the adoption of prefabrication to complement other mental health supporting programmes to improve the mental health and well-being of construction workers.
Authors
- Rasaki Kolawole Fagbenro (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4845-3888)
- Chethana Illankoon
- Riza Yosia Sunindijo
Institutions
- UNSW Sydney (AU)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Engineering Construction & Architectural Management
- Published
- 2026-03-20
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-12-2025-2010
- Primary Topic
- Occupational Health and Safety Research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00