Curriculum Reform, Competency Framework, and Technological Innovation in Undergraduate Materials Science and Engineering Education: A Systematic Review

Undergraduate education in Materials Science and Engineering (MSE) is evolving to cultivate engineers with integrated knowledge, practical skills, and professional competencies. This systematic review synthesizes 15 empirical studies published between 2016 and 2025 on curriculum reform, competency frameworks, assessment practices, and technology integration. Following PRISMA guidelines and thematic synthesis, the analysis revealed a shift from traditional knowledge transmission to competency-based learning, driven by external factors, including policy mandates, accreditation requirements, and industry demands, as well as internal curricular gaps. Two curriculum orientations were identified: a concept-oriented approach, leveraging simulations and research tools to deepen theoretical understanding, and a practice-oriented approach, emphasizing industry collaboration, project-based learning, and simulated professional tasks. Technology-enhanced learning supports both orientations: clarifying abstract concepts or modeling industrial decision-making. The gaps between broad competency goals and conventional assessment methods remain a challenge, although rare, yet innovative performance-based assessments have proven critical for capturing integrated competencies. The findings highlight that systemic curriculum design, strategic technology integration, and authentic assessment are essential for preparing graduates with the knowledge, skills, and adaptive capabilities required for professional success in MSE.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Chemical Education
Published
2026-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5c01454
Primary Topic
Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Curriculum Reform, Competency Framework, and Technological Innovation in Undergraduate Materials Science and Engineering Education: A Systematic Review

Mi Song Kim, Xiaohang Gai
Journal of Chemical Education
Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
article

Curriculum Reform, Competency Framework, and Technological Innovation in Undergraduate Materials Science and Engineering Education: A Systematic Review

Mi Song Kim, Xiaohang Gai
article en

Abstract

Undergraduate education in Materials Science and Engineering (MSE) is evolving to cultivate engineers with integrated knowledge, practical skills, and professional competencies. This systematic review synthesizes 15 empirical studies published between 2016 and 2025 on curriculum reform, competency frameworks, assessment practices, and technology integration. Following PRISMA guidelines and thematic synthesis, the analysis revealed a shift from traditional knowledge transmission to competency-based learning, driven by external factors, including policy mandates, accreditation requirements, and industry demands, as well as internal curricular gaps. Two curriculum orientations were identified: a concept-oriented approach, leveraging simulations and research tools to deepen theoretical understanding, and a practice-oriented approach, emphasizing industry collaboration, project-based learning, and simulated professional tasks. Technology-enhanced learning supports both orientations: clarifying abstract concepts or modeling industrial decision-making. The gaps between broad competency goals and conventional assessment methods remain a challenge, although rare, yet innovative performance-based assessments have proven critical for capturing integrated competencies. The findings highlight that systemic curriculum design, strategic technology integration, and authentic assessment are essential for preparing graduates with the knowledge, skills, and adaptive capabilities required for professional success in MSE.

Journal of Chemical Education
Western University (CA), BSCS Science Learning (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.