Integrating single-cell and single-nucleus datasets improves bulk RNA-seq deconvolution

Bulk RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) deconvolution typically uses single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) references, but some cells are only detectable through single-nucleus RNA sequencing (snRNA-seq). Because snRNA-seq captures nuclear, not cytoplasmic, transcripts, its direct use as a reference could reduce deconvolution accuracy. We benchmarked integration strategies across four tissues, comparing principal component (PC)-based latent shifts, conditional and non-conditional scVI (single cell variational inference), and cross-modality differentially expressed gene (DEG) filtering. All approaches improved over raw snRNA-seq, but pruning cross-modality DEGs produced the largest gains, often matching or exceeding scRNA-only references. Conditional scVI performed comparably and was effective when matched scRNA-snRNA cell types were unavailable. In real adipose bulk samples, DEG pruning and conditional scVI provided the most robust cell-fraction estimates across donors and transformations. These results demonstrate that scRNA-seq should be prioritized as a reference when available, and we recommend appending snRNA-seq only after removing cross-modality DEGs; when DEG information is limited, conditional scVI is a practical alternative.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cell Reports Methods
Published
2026-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crmeth.2026.101346
Primary Topic
Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating single-cell and single-nucleus datasets improves bulk RNA-seq deconvolution

Adriana Ivich, Casey S. Greene
Cell Reports Methods
Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
article

Integrating single-cell and single-nucleus datasets improves bulk RNA-seq deconvolution

Adriana Ivich, Casey S. Greene
article en

Abstract

Bulk RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) deconvolution typically uses single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) references, but some cells are only detectable through single-nucleus RNA sequencing (snRNA-seq). Because snRNA-seq captures nuclear, not cytoplasmic, transcripts, its direct use as a reference could reduce deconvolution accuracy. We benchmarked integration strategies across four tissues, comparing principal component (PC)-based latent shifts, conditional and non-conditional scVI (single cell variational inference), and cross-modality differentially expressed gene (DEG) filtering. All approaches improved over raw snRNA-seq, but pruning cross-modality DEGs produced the largest gains, often matching or exceeding scRNA-only references. Conditional scVI performed comparably and was effective when matched scRNA-snRNA cell types were unavailable. In real adipose bulk samples, DEG pruning and conditional scVI provided the most robust cell-fraction estimates across donors and transformations. These results demonstrate that scRNA-seq should be prioritized as a reference when available, and we recommend appending snRNA-seq only after removing cross-modality DEGs; when DEG information is limited, conditional scVI is a practical alternative.

Cell Reports Methods
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Integrating single-cell and single-nucleus datasets improves bulk RNA-seq deconvolution — Adriana Ivich, Casey S. Greene · Cell Reports Methods (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS