Exploring the Effectiveness of Hybrid Fiber–Reinforced Geopolymer Concrete

This paper presents an experimental study evaluating the mechanical and durability properties of plain, steel fiber (SF), and polypropylene fiber (PPF) reinforced industrial fly ash (IFA)-based geopolymer concrete (GPC) and compares the results with those of ordinary Portland cement-based conventional concrete (CC). The incorporation of fibers in GPC resulted in a gradual reduction in workability, with slump values decreasing from 130 to 70 mm across GPC mixes. However, significant improvements were observed in mechanical properties. Compressive strength increased from 34 MPa in CC to a maximum of 46 MPa in the hybrid mix (GPC8). Likewise, notable enhancements in split tensile strength (7.90 MPa) and flexural strength (10.10 MPa) were achieved in GPC8, highlighting the synergistic effect of hybrid fibers in improving postcracking behavior. The modulus of elasticity also improved substantially, with GPC8 reaching 50.20×103 MPa compared to 24.60×103 MPa in CC. The GPC specimens demonstrated superior durability compared to the CC specimens. GPC showed 25% lower wear in abrasion tests, which improved to a 60% reduction with the addition of SF and PPF. In acid resistance tests, GPC exhibited less than 2.26% weight loss and a maximum 22.50% reduction in compressive strength after 6 months in 3% H2SO4. Both GPC and CC showed less than 1% weight loss under sulphate attack. Under wet–dry cycles in a marine environment, GPC maintained durability, with mass loss and strength reduction not exceeding 5.26% and 23.83%, respectively. The optimum percentage of SF, PPF, and a combination of hybrid fiber specimens was 0.4% PPF, 1% SF, and 0.4% PPF+1.0% SF, showing improvement in mechanical properties and durability properties over CC of the same grade. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and x-ray diffraction analyses were consistent with the observed mechanical and durability results. Furthermore, SEM images revealed a dense microstructure and a well-integrated interface between the GPC matrix and the fibers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of structural design and construction practice.
Published
2026-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/jsdccc.sceng-2059
Primary Topic
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the Effectiveness of Hybrid Fiber–Reinforced Geopolymer Concrete

Hariom Khungar, Arjita Biswas, Shubhangi Shekokar, Venkatesh Wadki et al.
Journal of structural design and construction practice.
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
article

Exploring the Effectiveness of Hybrid Fiber–Reinforced Geopolymer Concrete

Hariom Khungar, Arjita Biswas, Shubhangi Shekokar, Venkatesh Wadki, Sandeep Sathe
article en

Abstract

This paper presents an experimental study evaluating the mechanical and durability properties of plain, steel fiber (SF), and polypropylene fiber (PPF) reinforced industrial fly ash (IFA)-based geopolymer concrete (GPC) and compares the results with those of ordinary Portland cement-based conventional concrete (CC). The incorporation of fibers in GPC resulted in a gradual reduction in workability, with slump values decreasing from 130 to 70 mm across GPC mixes. However, significant improvements were observed in mechanical properties. Compressive strength increased from 34 MPa in CC to a maximum of 46 MPa in the hybrid mix (GPC8). Likewise, notable enhancements in split tensile strength (7.90 MPa) and flexural strength (10.10 MPa) were achieved in GPC8, highlighting the synergistic effect of hybrid fibers in improving postcracking behavior. The modulus of elasticity also improved substantially, with GPC8 reaching 50.20×103 MPa compared to 24.60×103 MPa in CC. The GPC specimens demonstrated superior durability compared to the CC specimens. GPC showed 25% lower wear in abrasion tests, which improved to a 60% reduction with the addition of SF and PPF. In acid resistance tests, GPC exhibited less than 2.26% weight loss and a maximum 22.50% reduction in compressive strength after 6 months in 3% H2SO4. Both GPC and CC showed less than 1% weight loss under sulphate attack. Under wet–dry cycles in a marine environment, GPC maintained durability, with mass loss and strength reduction not exceeding 5.26% and 23.83%, respectively. The optimum percentage of SF, PPF, and a combination of hybrid fiber specimens was 0.4% PPF, 1% SF, and 0.4% PPF+1.0% SF, showing improvement in mechanical properties and durability properties over CC of the same grade. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and x-ray diffraction analyses were consistent with the observed mechanical and durability results. Furthermore, SEM images revealed a dense microstructure and a well-integrated interface between the GPC matrix and the fibers.

Journal of structural design and construction practice.Vol. 31(3)
MIT World Peace University (IN), National Institute of Construction Management and Research (IN), Cordoba University (US), REVA University (IN)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.