Is ChatGPT's Knowledge on Rhinology Accurate? Can It Be Utilized in Medical Education and Patient Information?

ABSTRACT Objective: The ChatGPT is a new artificial intelligence model designed to create human-like chats. As a result of advancing knowledge and technological improvements, it is promising in the field of medicine, especially as a resource for patients and clinicians. The aim of our study was to measure the accuracy and consistency of ChatGPT answers to questions in the field of rhinology.Methods: In March 2024, ChatGPT (ChatGPT version 4) was presented with 130 rhinology questions. Each question was asked to ChatGPT twice, and the consistency and reproducibility of the answers were investigated. The answers were evaluated by three ENT physicians. Results:The answers given by the ChatGPT were consistent at a rate of 91.5%(119/130). Among the inconsistent answers, the second answer was found to be more correct in out of 10/11. Statistically, the second answer was more correct (p:0011). In 130 questions, as a result of the controller evaluation, the number of answers evaluated as completely correct was 99/81/80(76.2%, 62.3%, and 61.5%, respectively). However, completely incorrect answers were observed in 5.4%, 4.6%, and 5.4%, respectively. Accordingly, there was no statistically significant difference between the controllers(p:0.270).Conclusion:The inaccuracy of ChatGPT in patient information and education processes is considered acceptable and reliable. However, it is also seen that ChatGPT answers are not completely correct and can provide misleading answers to some questions. We believe that it would be safer and more accurate to use ChatGPT as an informative and educational tool for patients with the control of experts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Rhinology and Allergy
Published
2026-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.65396/ejra.1859529
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is ChatGPT's Knowledge on Rhinology Accurate? Can It Be Utilized in Medical Education and Patient Information?

Oğuzhan Katar, Serdar Özer, Burçay Tellioğlu, Aykut Özdoğan
European Journal of Rhinology and Allergy
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Is ChatGPT's Knowledge on Rhinology Accurate? Can It Be Utilized in Medical Education and Patient Information?

Oğuzhan Katar, Serdar Özer, Burçay Tellioğlu, Aykut Özdoğan
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective: The ChatGPT is a new artificial intelligence model designed to create human-like chats. As a result of advancing knowledge and technological improvements, it is promising in the field of medicine, especially as a resource for patients and clinicians. The aim of our study was to measure the accuracy and consistency of ChatGPT answers to questions in the field of rhinology.Methods: In March 2024, ChatGPT (ChatGPT version 4) was presented with 130 rhinology questions. Each question was asked to ChatGPT twice, and the consistency and reproducibility of the answers were investigated. The answers were evaluated by three ENT physicians. Results:The answers given by the ChatGPT were consistent at a rate of 91.5%(119/130). Among the inconsistent answers, the second answer was found to be more correct in out of 10/11. Statistically, the second answer was more correct (p:0011). In 130 questions, as a result of the controller evaluation, the number of answers evaluated as completely correct was 99/81/80(76.2%, 62.3%, and 61.5%, respectively). However, completely incorrect answers were observed in 5.4%, 4.6%, and 5.4%, respectively. Accordingly, there was no statistically significant difference between the controllers(p:0.270).Conclusion:The inaccuracy of ChatGPT in patient information and education processes is considered acceptable and reliable. However, it is also seen that ChatGPT answers are not completely correct and can provide misleading answers to some questions. We believe that it would be safer and more accurate to use ChatGPT as an informative and educational tool for patients with the control of experts.

European Journal of Rhinology and AllergyVol. 9(1)
Ministry of Health (OM), Hacettepe University (TR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.