Hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with TARE monotherapy or combination therapy with curative intent: a retrospective, exploratory analysis of two European prospective studies
Abstract Purpose While transarterial radioembolization (TARE) with yttrium-90 (Y90) is an established local treatment option for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and as a curative monotherapy option, its role in curative combination treatment strategies is gaining interest amongst multidisciplinary teams. In this retrospective, exploratory analysis of the prospective observational CIRT studies (NCT02305459 and NCT03256994), we aimed to identify important factors involved in the application of TARE with curative intent. Methods This is a combined analysis of 615 HCC patients treated with TARE between 2015 and 2020. Baseline and treatment-related data were collected, and treating physicians were asked to record the a priori treatment intent. Follow-up data were collected every 3 months for at least 2 years. Patients were allocated to curative-intent and palliative-intent groups based on a posteriori treatment goal assessment. Results Contrary to a priori treatment intent (386/62.7% palliative vs 229/37.3% curative), most patients were treated with TARE with palliative intent as assessed a posteriori (575/93%). In the curative-intent group (40/6.5%), 20 patients underwent transplantation (50%), 7 ablation (17.5%) and 2 resection (5%) following TARE. Additionally, 11 (27.5%) patients did not receive further treatment, likely due to complete response after TARE. ECOG 0 and tumour volume < 150 cc were found to be associated with curative treatment allocation. Conclusion Our analysis of 40 patients successfully treated with TARE with curative intent displays the heterogeneity of treatment algorithms, including transplantation, ablation or resection, and points towards the potential of TARE as a standalone curative-intent treatment in selected cases. Further analyses on specific conversion criteria following TARE are warranted. Trials registration NCT02305459; NCT03256994. Graphical Abstract
Authors
- M. Mutuberria Urdaniz (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7683-1322)
- Bleranda Zeka
- T Helmberger
- Niels de Jong (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2377-2973)
- R. Loffroy
- Niklaus Schaefer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9732-7696)
- Milan Geyer
- Geert Maleux (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0598-0258)
- F Kolligs
- O. Pellerin
- Bora Peynircioglu
- Jose Ignacio Bilbao
- D. Arnold
- Maxime Ronot
- Valerie Vilgrain
- Bruno Sangro
Institutions
- Inserm (FR)
- Université Paris Cité (FR)
- Hôpital Beaujon (FR)
- Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven (BE)
- FWF Austrian Science Fund (AT)
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CH)
- München Klinik Bogenhausen (DE)
- Asklepios Klinik Altona (DE)
- Sorbonne Paris Cité (FR)
- Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR)
- Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou (FR)
- Hôpital Européen (FR)
- CHU Dijon Bourgogne (FR)
- Clinica Universidad de Navarra (ES)
- Helios Hospital Berlin-Buch (DE)
- Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (AT)
- Hacettepe University (TR)
Publication Details
- Journal
- CVIR Oncology
- Published
- 2026-03-26
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s44343-026-00035-5
- Primary Topic
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00