Erratum: Macroeconomic determinants of fertility rates: evidence from Vietnam

It has come to the attention of the publisher that the article: Le, T.B.N., Nguyen, T.T.H., Huynh, V.B.T. (2026), “Macroeconomic determinants of fertility rates: evidence from Vietnam”. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEAS-09-2025-0665, contained an error in Tables 3, 5 and 7.The note on Table 3 currently reads “***, **, and × denote significance at the 1%, 5%, and 10% levels, respectively”; these should read “*** and ** indicate statistical significance at the 1% and 5% levels, respectively.”The notes on Tables 5 and 7 currently read “***, **, and × indicate statistical significance at the 1%, 5%, and 10% levels, respectively”; this should read “***, **, and * indicate statistical significance at the 1%, 5%, and 10% levels, respectively.”This error was introduced during the article publication process, for which the publisher apologises.

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of economic and administrative sciences.
Published
2026-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jeas-03-2026-0243
Primary Topic
Family Dynamics and Relationships
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Erratum: Macroeconomic determinants of fertility rates: evidence from Vietnam

Journal of economic and administrative sciences.
Family Dynamics and Relationships
article

Erratum: Macroeconomic determinants of fertility rates: evidence from Vietnam

article en

Abstract

It has come to the attention of the publisher that the article: Le, T.B.N., Nguyen, T.T.H., Huynh, V.B.T. (2026), “Macroeconomic determinants of fertility rates: evidence from Vietnam”. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEAS-09-2025-0665, contained an error in Tables 3, 5 and 7.The note on Table 3 currently reads “***, **, and × denote significance at the 1%, 5%, and 10% levels, respectively”; these should read “*** and ** indicate statistical significance at the 1% and 5% levels, respectively.”The notes on Tables 5 and 7 currently read “***, **, and × indicate statistical significance at the 1%, 5%, and 10% levels, respectively”; this should read “***, **, and * indicate statistical significance at the 1%, 5%, and 10% levels, respectively.”This error was introduced during the article publication process, for which the publisher apologises.

Journal of economic and administrative sciences.
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Family Dynamics and Relationships
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.