Access to health and harm reduction services during drug decriminalization in British Columbia, Canada: a mixed-method study

On January 31st 2023, the Canadian province of British Columbia temporarily decriminalized the personal possession of certain illegal drugs up to 2.5 g, cumulatively, for adults. A stated aim of this policy directive was to reduce the stigmatization of people who use drugs and increase access to health and harm reduction services. The aim of this study was to capture the prevalence and nature of potential barriers to such services under drug decriminalization. We employed a mixed-methods study design, triangulating survey data from harm reduction service users in 2022 (n = 503) and 2023 (n = 433) alongside qualitative interviews with people who use drugs in British Columbia (n = 78) collected in 2023. Qualitative and quantitative findings were analysed convergently. Findings across both datasets suggest that reported barriers to health and harm reduction services persisted during British Columbia’s decriminalization pilot. Quantitative and qualitative data reflecting these barriers are presented in parallel under four themes: (1) stigma and fear of substance use disclosure, (2) stigma and access to services, (3) service-specific barriers, and (4) police-related barriers. Decriminalization alone may be insufficient to address and/or mitigate the barriers that continue to constrain people who use drugs’ access to care. If the policy goal is to reduce barriers to health and harm reduction services, additional structural and institutional supports may be required. Barriers to accessing health and harm reduction services persisted during BC’s decriminalization pilot. Perceived stigma limited access to health and harm reduction services. Inhalation services remain limited at observed consumption sites across BC. Despite the legal reform, policing practices discouraged health service attendance. Decriminalization alone may be insufficient in eliminating service barriers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Public Health
Published
2026-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-026-26978-1
Primary Topic
HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Access to health and harm reduction services during drug decriminalization in British Columbia, Canada: a mixed-method study

Brooke Kinniburgh, Alexis Crabtree, Benjamin D. Scher, Naomi Zakimi et al.
BMC Public Health
HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
article

Access to health and harm reduction services during drug decriminalization in British Columbia, Canada: a mixed-method study

Brooke Kinniburgh, Alexis Crabtree, Benjamin D. Scher, Naomi Zakimi, Mieke Fraser, Becca Wood, Kaitlin Fajber, Alissa Greer, O. Kara Loewen
article en

Abstract

On January 31st 2023, the Canadian province of British Columbia temporarily decriminalized the personal possession of certain illegal drugs up to 2.5 g, cumulatively, for adults. A stated aim of this policy directive was to reduce the stigmatization of people who use drugs and increase access to health and harm reduction services. The aim of this study was to capture the prevalence and nature of potential barriers to such services under drug decriminalization. We employed a mixed-methods study design, triangulating survey data from harm reduction service users in 2022 (n = 503) and 2023 (n = 433) alongside qualitative interviews with people who use drugs in British Columbia (n = 78) collected in 2023. Qualitative and quantitative findings were analysed convergently. Findings across both datasets suggest that reported barriers to health and harm reduction services persisted during British Columbia’s decriminalization pilot. Quantitative and qualitative data reflecting these barriers are presented in parallel under four themes: (1) stigma and fear of substance use disclosure, (2) stigma and access to services, (3) service-specific barriers, and (4) police-related barriers. Decriminalization alone may be insufficient to address and/or mitigate the barriers that continue to constrain people who use drugs’ access to care. If the policy goal is to reduce barriers to health and harm reduction services, additional structural and institutional supports may be required. Barriers to accessing health and harm reduction services persisted during BC’s decriminalization pilot. Perceived stigma limited access to health and harm reduction services. Inhalation services remain limited at observed consumption sites across BC. Despite the legal reform, policing practices discouraged health service attendance. Decriminalization alone may be insufficient in eliminating service barriers.

BMC Public Health
Public Health Agency of Canada (CA), Simon Fraser University (CA), Princeton University (US), Oxford Policy Management (GB), Princeton Public Schools (US), BC Centre for Disease Control (CA), University of Oxford (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.