Validity and reliability of intraoral photographs for tooth-level caries classification using ICCMS™ in preschool children

Objectives: The International Caries Classification and Management System (ICCMS™) provides a structured framework for comprehensive caries diagnosis and management. However, its clinical application in young children is often limited by logistical challenges. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic validity and inter-method reliability of intraoral photographic assessment for classifying tooth-level caries using ICCMS™ merged categories, compared with conventional clinical visual-tactile examination in preschool children. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 280 preschool children aged 3–4 years from public kindergartens in Ho Chi Minh City. Each child underwent a full-mouth clinical examination using the ICDAS™ protocol, followed by intraoral photographs taken under standardized lighting and positioning conditions. Caries lesions were reclassified into ICCMS™ merged categories: 0 (sound), A+/− (initial), B+/− (moderate), and C+/− (extensive). Blinded evaluators assessed all photographs independently. Diagnostic validity (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value [PPV], negative predictive value [NPV]) and reliability (Cohen’s Kappa, intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]) were analyzed at the tooth level using confusion matrices and F1-scores. Results: A total of 5,523 teeth were evaluated. Overall agreement between photographic and clinical examinations was substantial (Cohen’s Kappa = 0.772). Diagnostic accuracy was highest for sound teeth (category 0: sensitivity 91.6%, specificity 89.9%) and extensive lesions (C+/−: sensitivity 93.4%, specificity 97.4%). Moderate agreement was observed for early-stage lesions (A+/−: Kappa = 0.684; sensitivity 74.6%) and moderate lesions (B+/−: Kappa = 0.640; sensitivity 60.5%), indicating underdetection of subtle enamel changes in photographs. F1-scores were highest for categories 0 (0.849) and C+/− (0.937), confirming strong diagnostic performance for healthy and advanced lesions. Conclusions: Intraoral photography demonstrates substantial validity and reliability for tooth-level caries classification using ICCMS™ in preschool children, particularly for identifying sound and extensive lesions. While this approach is promising for teledentistry, epidemiological surveillance, and preventive dentistry programs, its reduced sensitivity for early lesions suggests the need for higher-resolution imaging or adjunctive detection technologies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Indian Journal of Dental Research
Published
2026-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/ijdr_202637s1_abs_18
Primary Topic
Dental Health and Care Utilization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validity and reliability of intraoral photographs for tooth-level caries classification using ICCMS™ in preschool children

H. M. James Hung, Minh Khanh Nguyen, Đào Quang Khải, Chau Ngo Uyen et al.
Indian Journal of Dental Research
Dental Health and Care Utilization
article

Validity and reliability of intraoral photographs for tooth-level caries classification using ICCMS™ in preschool children

H. M. James Hung, Minh Khanh Nguyen, Đào Quang Khải, Chau Ngo Uyen, Gia Hy Luong
article en

Abstract

Objectives: The International Caries Classification and Management System (ICCMS™) provides a structured framework for comprehensive caries diagnosis and management. However, its clinical application in young children is often limited by logistical challenges. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic validity and inter-method reliability of intraoral photographic assessment for classifying tooth-level caries using ICCMS™ merged categories, compared with conventional clinical visual-tactile examination in preschool children. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 280 preschool children aged 3–4 years from public kindergartens in Ho Chi Minh City. Each child underwent a full-mouth clinical examination using the ICDAS™ protocol, followed by intraoral photographs taken under standardized lighting and positioning conditions. Caries lesions were reclassified into ICCMS™ merged categories: 0 (sound), A+/− (initial), B+/− (moderate), and C+/− (extensive). Blinded evaluators assessed all photographs independently. Diagnostic validity (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value [PPV], negative predictive value [NPV]) and reliability (Cohen’s Kappa, intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]) were analyzed at the tooth level using confusion matrices and F1-scores. Results: A total of 5,523 teeth were evaluated. Overall agreement between photographic and clinical examinations was substantial (Cohen’s Kappa = 0.772). Diagnostic accuracy was highest for sound teeth (category 0: sensitivity 91.6%, specificity 89.9%) and extensive lesions (C+/−: sensitivity 93.4%, specificity 97.4%). Moderate agreement was observed for early-stage lesions (A+/−: Kappa = 0.684; sensitivity 74.6%) and moderate lesions (B+/−: Kappa = 0.640; sensitivity 60.5%), indicating underdetection of subtle enamel changes in photographs. F1-scores were highest for categories 0 (0.849) and C+/− (0.937), confirming strong diagnostic performance for healthy and advanced lesions. Conclusions: Intraoral photography demonstrates substantial validity and reliability for tooth-level caries classification using ICCMS™ in preschool children, particularly for identifying sound and extensive lesions. While this approach is promising for teledentistry, epidemiological surveillance, and preventive dentistry programs, its reduced sensitivity for early lesions suggests the need for higher-resolution imaging or adjunctive detection technologies.

Indian Journal of Dental ResearchVol. 37(Suppl 1)
University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City (VN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Dental Health and Care Utilization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.