The Historical Ethnology of Steppe Nomadism in the Empire of New Rome, <i>c</i> .450–1100 Michael Attaleiates and John Skylitzes on the Turks

The eleventh century is a paradox and watershed in East Roman history. One essential element is new nomadic polities entering imperial space from the Central Eurasian steppe, the Oghuz Turkish groups following members of the Seljuq lineage in the east, and Pecheneg polities in the west. In their attempts to develop narratives that explain their historical role, Roman historians engaged in historical ethnology. The traces lead back through six centuries of contact with “Turks”. Against “archaising” characterisations I argue that these writers took a critical approach to steppe ethnology, revealing a discourse stretching back for some half a millennium. Even so, Roman historians did not engage in historical ethnology for its own sake, but to utilise it in “policy debates”. In the twelfth century new conditions demanded new strategies of identification, leaving the eleventh-century ethnology a witness to a particular historical moment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Late Antique Islamic and Byzantine Studies
Published
2026-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3366/jlaibs.2026.0055
Primary Topic
Eurasian Exchange Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Historical Ethnology of Steppe Nomadism in the Empire of New Rome, c .450–1100 Michael Attaleiates and John Skylitzes on the Turks

Nicholas S. M. Matheou
Journal of Late Antique Islamic and Byzantine Studies
Eurasian Exchange Networks
article

The Historical Ethnology of Steppe Nomadism in the Empire of New Rome, c .450–1100 Michael Attaleiates and John Skylitzes on the Turks

Nicholas S. M. Matheou
article en

Abstract

The eleventh century is a paradox and watershed in East Roman history. One essential element is new nomadic polities entering imperial space from the Central Eurasian steppe, the Oghuz Turkish groups following members of the Seljuq lineage in the east, and Pecheneg polities in the west. In their attempts to develop narratives that explain their historical role, Roman historians engaged in historical ethnology. The traces lead back through six centuries of contact with “Turks”. Against “archaising” characterisations I argue that these writers took a critical approach to steppe ethnology, revealing a discourse stretching back for some half a millennium. Even so, Roman historians did not engage in historical ethnology for its own sake, but to utilise it in “policy debates”. In the twelfth century new conditions demanded new strategies of identification, leaving the eleventh-century ethnology a witness to a particular historical moment.

Journal of Late Antique Islamic and Byzantine StudiesVol. 5(1)
University of Edinburgh (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Eurasian Exchange Networks
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Historical Ethnology of Steppe Nomadism in the Empire of New Rome, <i>c</i> .450–1100 Michael Attaleiates and John Skylitzes on the Turks — Nicholas S. M. Matheou · Journal of Late Antique Islamic and Byzantine Studies (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS