Children's Inalienable Literacy Education Rights and the Science of Reading

ABSTRACT The widely ratified 1989 UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) enumerated essential human rights for children, with emphasis on supporting children's humanity and dignity. Schools play a vital role in upholding these rights, and the literacy classroom is a key domain where children should experience and exercise them. However, little scholarship has systematically explored what the CRC means for literacy education. This paper considers how 20th and 21st century literacy education has often fallen short of honoring children's CRC rights and how the currently prevalent science of reading paradigm, although it strongly emphasizes one right (the right to read), offers insufficient guidance to ensure that literacy education is fully rights‐affirming. We then discuss 15 literacy education rights drawn directly from CRC rights that, taken together, form a rights‐affirming literacy education (RALE) framework. These include provision of support for literacy development; development of the whole child; rest, leisure, and play; social interaction; family involvement; language and linguistic identity; cultural understanding and connection; imagination and creativity; humanity and citizenship; access to knowledge; freedom of thought and expression; protection from censorship and harmful content; voice and influence; a safe and respectful learning environment; and freedom from discrimination. We discuss potential challenges to realizing RALE and provide an example of how a rights‐affirming approach, Philosophy for Children, opens space for fulfilling literacy education rights. We argue that practice, policy, and research in literacy education must become deliberately rights‐affirming if it is to honor the CRC's promises to children.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Reading Research Quarterly
Published
2026-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.70104
Primary Topic
Children's Rights and Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Children's Inalienable Literacy Education Rights and the Science of Reading

Maren Aukerman, Rachel J. Birch, Leanne Fray
Reading Research Quarterly
Children's Rights and Participation
article

Children's Inalienable Literacy Education Rights and the Science of Reading

Maren Aukerman, Rachel J. Birch, Leanne Fray
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The widely ratified 1989 UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) enumerated essential human rights for children, with emphasis on supporting children's humanity and dignity. Schools play a vital role in upholding these rights, and the literacy classroom is a key domain where children should experience and exercise them. However, little scholarship has systematically explored what the CRC means for literacy education. This paper considers how 20th and 21st century literacy education has often fallen short of honoring children's CRC rights and how the currently prevalent science of reading paradigm, although it strongly emphasizes one right (the right to read), offers insufficient guidance to ensure that literacy education is fully rights‐affirming. We then discuss 15 literacy education rights drawn directly from CRC rights that, taken together, form a rights‐affirming literacy education (RALE) framework. These include provision of support for literacy development; development of the whole child; rest, leisure, and play; social interaction; family involvement; language and linguistic identity; cultural understanding and connection; imagination and creativity; humanity and citizenship; access to knowledge; freedom of thought and expression; protection from censorship and harmful content; voice and influence; a safe and respectful learning environment; and freedom from discrimination. We discuss potential challenges to realizing RALE and provide an example of how a rights‐affirming approach, Philosophy for Children, opens space for fulfilling literacy education rights. We argue that practice, policy, and research in literacy education must become deliberately rights‐affirming if it is to honor the CRC's promises to children.

Reading Research QuarterlyVol. 61(2)
University of Calgary (CA), University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Children's Rights and Participation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.