Resting physiological and perceptual responses to nasal high-flow O <sub>2</sub> therapy in naïve patients with fibrotic interstitial lung disease

<b>Background.</b> Fibrotic interstitial lung disease (<i>f</i>-ILD) is characterized by impaired pulmonary gas exchange, increased ventilatory demand and disabling dyspnea. Conventional O<sub>2</sub> therapy at rest improves patients' oxygenation but not ventilatory requirements. Nasal high-flow (NHF) with or without supplemental O<sub>2</sub> may reduce ventilatory demand but its acute physiological and perceptual benefits remain unclear in <i>f</i>-ILD. <b>Methods.</b> Fifteen naïve patients (partial pressure of arterial O<sub>2</sub>= 57±12 mmHg) underwent, in a randomized, single-blind, cross-over trial, six bouts of 7-min exposure: room air; conventional O<sub>2</sub> [fraction of inspired O<sub>2</sub> (FiO<sub>2</sub>)=0.5 or 1.0]; NHF<sub>air</sub> (30 L·min-1, FiO<sub>2</sub>=0.21); and NHFO<sub>2</sub> (30 L·min⁻¹, FiO<sub>2</sub>=0.3 or 0.5). Breathing pattern (respiratory plethysmography), O<sub>2</sub> saturation (SpO<sub>2</sub>) and dyspnea intensity (Borg CR-10) and qualitative descriptors were compared across conditions. <b>Results.</b> SpO<sub>2</sub> improved in O<sub>2</sub>-enriched conditions (≥98%) vs air and NHF<sub>air</sub> (~92%; p<0.001). NHF<sub>air</sub>, NHFO<sub>2</sub> with FiO<sub>2</sub>=0.3 and FiO<sub>2</sub>=0.5 lessened ventilation vs room air (7.8±3.0, 7.1±3.3, 7.0±2.5 and 9.3±3.0 L·min<sup>-1</sup>, respectively; all <i>p</i>≤0.044), but conventional O<sub>2</sub> had no significant effect. Respiratory rate only decreased with NHFO<sub>2</sub> with FiO<sub>2</sub>=0.3 vs air (20±6 vs 23±5 breaths·min-1; p=0.008). Dyspnea intensity was greater with NHF modalities vs conventional O<sub>2</sub> (~1 Borg unit; all p≤0.030); qualitative descriptors did not differ across conditions. <b>Conclusion.</b> In moderately-hypoxemic patients with <i>f</i>-ILD, NHF (regardless of O<sub>2</sub> enrichment) but not conventional O<sub>2</sub> therapy lessened resting ventilatory requirements. Concurrently, NHF increased dyspnea intensity despite preserved qualitative dimensions, suggesting dissociation between physiological and perceptual responses in this population. These findings highlight the need for individualized strategies when implementing NHFO<sub>2</sub> in naïve patients with <i>f</i>-ILD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Physiology
Published
2026-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.01206.2025
Primary Topic
Sinusitis and nasal conditions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Resting physiological and perceptual responses to nasal high-flow O 2 therapy in naïve patients with fibrotic interstitial lung disease

M Marillier, Samuel Vergès, Sarah Thivent, Frédéric Hérengt et al.
Journal of Applied Physiology
Sinusitis and nasal conditions
article

Resting physiological and perceptual responses to nasal high-flow O 2 therapy in naïve patients with fibrotic interstitial lung disease

M Marillier, Samuel Vergès, Sarah Thivent, Frédéric Hérengt, Marylise Ginoux
article en

Abstract

<b>Background.</b> Fibrotic interstitial lung disease (<i>f</i>-ILD) is characterized by impaired pulmonary gas exchange, increased ventilatory demand and disabling dyspnea. Conventional O<sub>2</sub> therapy at rest improves patients' oxygenation but not ventilatory requirements. Nasal high-flow (NHF) with or without supplemental O<sub>2</sub> may reduce ventilatory demand but its acute physiological and perceptual benefits remain unclear in <i>f</i>-ILD. <b>Methods.</b> Fifteen naïve patients (partial pressure of arterial O<sub>2</sub>= 57±12 mmHg) underwent, in a randomized, single-blind, cross-over trial, six bouts of 7-min exposure: room air; conventional O<sub>2</sub> [fraction of inspired O<sub>2</sub> (FiO<sub>2</sub>)=0.5 or 1.0]; NHF<sub>air</sub> (30 L·min-1, FiO<sub>2</sub>=0.21); and NHFO<sub>2</sub> (30 L·min⁻¹, FiO<sub>2</sub>=0.3 or 0.5). Breathing pattern (respiratory plethysmography), O<sub>2</sub> saturation (SpO<sub>2</sub>) and dyspnea intensity (Borg CR-10) and qualitative descriptors were compared across conditions. <b>Results.</b> SpO<sub>2</sub> improved in O<sub>2</sub>-enriched conditions (≥98%) vs air and NHF<sub>air</sub> (~92%; p<0.001). NHF<sub>air</sub>, NHFO<sub>2</sub> with FiO<sub>2</sub>=0.3 and FiO<sub>2</sub>=0.5 lessened ventilation vs room air (7.8±3.0, 7.1±3.3, 7.0±2.5 and 9.3±3.0 L·min<sup>-1</sup>, respectively; all <i>p</i>≤0.044), but conventional O<sub>2</sub> had no significant effect. Respiratory rate only decreased with NHFO<sub>2</sub> with FiO<sub>2</sub>=0.3 vs air (20±6 vs 23±5 breaths·min-1; p=0.008). Dyspnea intensity was greater with NHF modalities vs conventional O<sub>2</sub> (~1 Borg unit; all p≤0.030); qualitative descriptors did not differ across conditions. <b>Conclusion.</b> In moderately-hypoxemic patients with <i>f</i>-ILD, NHF (regardless of O<sub>2</sub> enrichment) but not conventional O<sub>2</sub> therapy lessened resting ventilatory requirements. Concurrently, NHF increased dyspnea intensity despite preserved qualitative dimensions, suggesting dissociation between physiological and perceptual responses in this population. These findings highlight the need for individualized strategies when implementing NHFO<sub>2</sub> in naïve patients with <i>f</i>-ILD.

Journal of Applied Physiology
Cardiopulmonary Research Science and Technology Institute (US), Université Grenoble Alpes (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Sinusitis and nasal conditions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.