Patient Perceptions and Perceived Barriers to Orthodontic Treatment: Correlation with Screening-Based Orthodontic Needs and Socioeconomic Status in a Central Government Hospital

Objectives: Many dental patients report perceived barriers that discourage them from seeking orthodontic treatment, even when clinical needs are present. In contemporary practice, barriers such as high cost, limited availability, or prolonged treatment may be less substantial than commonly assumed, yet patients continue to perceive them as significant. Furthermore, even individuals with no or only mild orthodontic needs may hold perceptions that influence the attitudes and decisions of others. This study assessed perceptions and perceived barriers toward orthodontic treatment among dental patients and examined their correlation with screening-based orthodontic treatment needs and socioeconomic status. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 125 patients attending the Outpatient Department at CDER, AIIMS, New Delhi, for reasons other than orthodontic treatment. Patients previously diagnosed with orthodontic needs but not initiated on treatment were also included. Perceptions and barriers were assessed using a structured questionnaire, and exploratory factor analysis grouped items into five domains: knowledge and awareness, attitudes and perceptions, psychological and cultural, logistical and accessibility, and financial and socioeconomic. Orthodontic needs were screened using a simplified Orthodontic Aesthetic Index. SES was measured using the Kuppuswamy scale. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. Results: Financial concerns, long treatment duration, fear of pain, and logistical difficulties were the most frequently reported barriers. Screening identified orthodontic treatment needs ranging from none to definite requirement. Significant correlations revealed that patients with greater orthodontic needs and lower SES more often reported psychological and cultural barriers. Conclusions: Perceived barriers to orthodontic care remain prevalent, even when treatment is accessible. Associations with orthodontic need and SES suggest that disparities in perception continue to shape treatment decisions. Addressing these misperceptions through SES-sensitive and perception-focused strategies is essential to improve acceptance and utilization of orthodontic services.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Indian Journal of Dental Research
Published
2026-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/ijdr_202637s1_abs_185
Primary Topic
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patient Perceptions and Perceived Barriers to Orthodontic Treatment: Correlation with Screening-Based Orthodontic Needs and Socioeconomic Status in a Central Government Hospital

Harsh Priya, Ritu Duggal, Bharathi M. Purohit, Sarah Paul et al.
Indian Journal of Dental Research
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
article

Patient Perceptions and Perceived Barriers to Orthodontic Treatment: Correlation with Screening-Based Orthodontic Needs and Socioeconomic Status in a Central Government Hospital

Harsh Priya, Ritu Duggal, Bharathi M. Purohit, Sarah Paul, Neha Chauhan, Vijay Prakash Mathur, K S Aparna
article en

Abstract

Objectives: Many dental patients report perceived barriers that discourage them from seeking orthodontic treatment, even when clinical needs are present. In contemporary practice, barriers such as high cost, limited availability, or prolonged treatment may be less substantial than commonly assumed, yet patients continue to perceive them as significant. Furthermore, even individuals with no or only mild orthodontic needs may hold perceptions that influence the attitudes and decisions of others. This study assessed perceptions and perceived barriers toward orthodontic treatment among dental patients and examined their correlation with screening-based orthodontic treatment needs and socioeconomic status. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 125 patients attending the Outpatient Department at CDER, AIIMS, New Delhi, for reasons other than orthodontic treatment. Patients previously diagnosed with orthodontic needs but not initiated on treatment were also included. Perceptions and barriers were assessed using a structured questionnaire, and exploratory factor analysis grouped items into five domains: knowledge and awareness, attitudes and perceptions, psychological and cultural, logistical and accessibility, and financial and socioeconomic. Orthodontic needs were screened using a simplified Orthodontic Aesthetic Index. SES was measured using the Kuppuswamy scale. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. Results: Financial concerns, long treatment duration, fear of pain, and logistical difficulties were the most frequently reported barriers. Screening identified orthodontic treatment needs ranging from none to definite requirement. Significant correlations revealed that patients with greater orthodontic needs and lower SES more often reported psychological and cultural barriers. Conclusions: Perceived barriers to orthodontic care remain prevalent, even when treatment is accessible. Associations with orthodontic need and SES suggest that disparities in perception continue to shape treatment decisions. Addressing these misperceptions through SES-sensitive and perception-focused strategies is essential to improve acceptance and utilization of orthodontic services.

Indian Journal of Dental ResearchVol. 37(Suppl 1)
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Raipur (IN), Indian Army (IN), National Institute of Medical Statistics (IN), Centre for Social Sciences and Humanities (IN), All India Institute of Medical Sciences (IN), Public Health Foundation of India (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.