Socioeconomic disparities in treatment and survival of oesophageal and gastric cancer in the Netherlands: a nationwide population-based study

BackgroundIn the Netherlands, all inhabitants are required to have health insurance that covers standard medical care.While this regulated system aims to ensure equal access, recent evidence suggests that socioeconomic status (SES) disparities still exist.This study investigates SES-related differences in treatment and survival among patients with gastric or oesophageal cancer.Methods This nationwide population-based study included gastroesophageal cancer patients diagnosed in 2015-2022.Patients were stratified into three SES-groups using median disposable household income per postal code area, an additional stratification was performed by histological subtype.Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the likelihood of receiving specific treatments for different tumour types.Age-standardized relative survival was calculated as the ratio of observed survival to expected survival based on age, sex, calendar year, and median household income group in the general population.Findings In total, 30,184 gastroesophageal cancer patients were categorized.In curable gastric cancer, patients with middle income had a significantly higher likelihood of receiving surgery compared to low income (OR 1.48 (95% CI 1.21-1.80),p < 0.001).For oesophageal cancer, both middle-(OR 1.17 (95% CI 1.05-1.30),p < 0.001) and highincome patients (OR 1.27 (95% CI 1.13-1.43),p < 0.001) were more likely to undergo surgery than those with low income.In palliative settings, middle-and high-income patients were also more likely to receive systemic therapy, in oesophageal cancer (OR 1.38 (95% CI 1.21-1.57),p < 0.001; OR 1.53 (95% CI 1.34-1.74),p < 0.001) and in gastric for high income (OR 1.27 (95% CI 1.05-1.55),p = 0.014).Relative survival analyses further demonstrated that middle-and high-income groups consistently had higher median, and 5-year survival compared to the low-income group.Interpretation Despite universal health insurance, socioeconomic disparities in treatment and survival of gastroesophageal cancer patients persist in the Netherlands, reflecting not inequitable access but broader life-course health disparities that influence treatment fitness and outcomes.These findings highlight the need to address broader social and systemic determinants to improve equity in cancer care, in the Netherlands and globally.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Lancet Regional Health - Europe
Published
2026-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanepe.2026.101662
Primary Topic
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Socioeconomic disparities in treatment and survival of oesophageal and gastric cancer in the Netherlands: a nationwide population-based study

Rob H.A. Verhoeven, P. van Rossum, Mats D Teeken, M I van Berge Henegouwen et al.
The Lancet Regional Health - Europe
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
article

Socioeconomic disparities in treatment and survival of oesophageal and gastric cancer in the Netherlands: a nationwide population-based study

Rob H.A. Verhoeven, P. van Rossum, Mats D Teeken, M I van Berge Henegouwen, Hanneke W.M. van Laarhoven, Nadia Haj Mohammad, Suzanne S. Gisbertz, Sjoerd M. Lagarde, Dillen C. van der Aa
article en

Abstract

BackgroundIn the Netherlands, all inhabitants are required to have health insurance that covers standard medical care.While this regulated system aims to ensure equal access, recent evidence suggests that socioeconomic status (SES) disparities still exist.This study investigates SES-related differences in treatment and survival among patients with gastric or oesophageal cancer.Methods This nationwide population-based study included gastroesophageal cancer patients diagnosed in 2015-2022.Patients were stratified into three SES-groups using median disposable household income per postal code area, an additional stratification was performed by histological subtype.Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the likelihood of receiving specific treatments for different tumour types.Age-standardized relative survival was calculated as the ratio of observed survival to expected survival based on age, sex, calendar year, and median household income group in the general population.Findings In total, 30,184 gastroesophageal cancer patients were categorized.In curable gastric cancer, patients with middle income had a significantly higher likelihood of receiving surgery compared to low income (OR 1.48 (95% CI 1.21-1.80),p < 0.001).For oesophageal cancer, both middle-(OR 1.17 (95% CI 1.05-1.30),p < 0.001) and highincome patients (OR 1.27 (95% CI 1.13-1.43),p < 0.001) were more likely to undergo surgery than those with low income.In palliative settings, middle-and high-income patients were also more likely to receive systemic therapy, in oesophageal cancer (OR 1.38 (95% CI 1.21-1.57),p < 0.001; OR 1.53 (95% CI 1.34-1.74),p < 0.001) and in gastric for high income (OR 1.27 (95% CI 1.05-1.55),p = 0.014).Relative survival analyses further demonstrated that middle-and high-income groups consistently had higher median, and 5-year survival compared to the low-income group.Interpretation Despite universal health insurance, socioeconomic disparities in treatment and survival of gastroesophageal cancer patients persist in the Netherlands, reflecting not inequitable access but broader life-course health disparities that influence treatment fitness and outcomes.These findings highlight the need to address broader social and systemic determinants to improve equity in cancer care, in the Netherlands and globally.

The Lancet Regional Health - EuropeVol. 65
Utrecht University (NL), University Medical Center Utrecht (NL), Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (NL), Erasmus MC Cancer Institute (NL), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.