Prospective Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Decompressive Craniectomy with Watertight Duraplasty and without Watertight Duraplasty in Traumatic Brain Injury

Abstract Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is a life-saving procedure for refractory intracranial hypertension following traumatic brain injury (TBI). Despite its widespread use, there is no consensus regarding optimal dural management. Whether watertight duraplasty is necessary during DC remains controversial. The aim of the study is to compare clinical outcomes, postoperative complications, and cranioplasty-related outcomes following DC performed with and without watertight duraplasty in patients with TBI. This prospective randomized controlled study included 200 patients (15–65 years) undergoing unilateral DC for TBI between January 2020 and December 2022. Patients were randomized to DC with watertight duraplasty (n = 100) or non-watertight duraplasty (n = 100). Intraoperative parameters, postoperative complications, mortality, and functional outcomes using the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) at 6 months were analyzed. Outcomes following subsequent cranioplasty were also assessed. Statistical analysis included unpaired t-tests and Fisher exact tests. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were comparable between groups. The non-watertight duraplasty group demonstrated significantly shorter operative time and lower intraoperative blood loss (p <0.001). Postoperative complication rates, including cerebrospinal fluid leak, wound infection, hydrocephalus, and subdural hygroma, did not differ significantly between groups (p = 0.65). Mortality was 24% in the watertight group and 28% in the non-watertight group. Functional outcomes at 6 months were similar, with no significant difference in GOS scores (p = 0.793). Cranioplasty-related operative metrics and complication rates were also comparable between groups. DC performed with or without watertight duraplasty yields similar postoperative complications, mortality, functional outcomes, and cranioplasty-related results in patients with TBI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Journal of Neurosurgery
Published
2026-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0046-1819626
Primary Topic
Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prospective Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Decompressive Craniectomy with Watertight Duraplasty and without Watertight Duraplasty in Traumatic Brain Injury

Anant V. Chopde, Vinay Kumar, Ishwar Singh, Manjulata Kumawat et al.
Asian Journal of Neurosurgery
Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
article

Prospective Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Decompressive Craniectomy with Watertight Duraplasty and without Watertight Duraplasty in Traumatic Brain Injury

Anant V. Chopde, Vinay Kumar, Ishwar Singh, Manjulata Kumawat, Gopal Krishna, Varun Aggarwal
article en

Abstract

Abstract Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is a life-saving procedure for refractory intracranial hypertension following traumatic brain injury (TBI). Despite its widespread use, there is no consensus regarding optimal dural management. Whether watertight duraplasty is necessary during DC remains controversial. The aim of the study is to compare clinical outcomes, postoperative complications, and cranioplasty-related outcomes following DC performed with and without watertight duraplasty in patients with TBI. This prospective randomized controlled study included 200 patients (15–65 years) undergoing unilateral DC for TBI between January 2020 and December 2022. Patients were randomized to DC with watertight duraplasty (n = 100) or non-watertight duraplasty (n = 100). Intraoperative parameters, postoperative complications, mortality, and functional outcomes using the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) at 6 months were analyzed. Outcomes following subsequent cranioplasty were also assessed. Statistical analysis included unpaired t-tests and Fisher exact tests. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were comparable between groups. The non-watertight duraplasty group demonstrated significantly shorter operative time and lower intraoperative blood loss (p <0.001). Postoperative complication rates, including cerebrospinal fluid leak, wound infection, hydrocephalus, and subdural hygroma, did not differ significantly between groups (p = 0.65). Mortality was 24% in the watertight group and 28% in the non-watertight group. Functional outcomes at 6 months were similar, with no significant difference in GOS scores (p = 0.793). Cranioplasty-related operative metrics and complication rates were also comparable between groups. DC performed with or without watertight duraplasty yields similar postoperative complications, mortality, functional outcomes, and cranioplasty-related results in patients with TBI.

Asian Journal of Neurosurgery
Pandit Bhagwat Dayal Sharma University of Health Sciences (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.