RWE Submission for European Regulators and Payers: Challenges, Uncertainties, and Opportunities

The new European Union Joint Clinical Assessment (JCA) process, effective January 2025, requires pharmaceutical companies to submit evidence within 100 days of notification. Key challenges include uncertainty about PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcomes) parameters prior to PICO notification, limited timeframe for evidence generation, and need to reconcile differences between regulatory versus health technology assessment (HTA) evidence standards. Uncertainties involve predicting PICOs accurately and determining real-world evidence's (RWE) appropriate role. However, opportunities exist for integrated evidence planning across clinical development, regulatory, and health economics and outcomes research (HEOR) teams, leveraging real-world data to inform or address PICOs as well as support regulatory evidence requirements. Early alignment between key functional teams, combined with proactive RWE use, is essential for generating fit-for-purpose evidence that satisfies the dual scrutiny of regulatory approval and HTA relative effectiveness assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science
Published
2026-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-026-00958-4
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

RWE Submission for European Regulators and Payers: Challenges, Uncertainties, and Opportunities

Lockwood G. Taylor, Blythe Adamson
Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

RWE Submission for European Regulators and Payers: Challenges, Uncertainties, and Opportunities

Lockwood G. Taylor, Blythe Adamson
article en

Abstract

The new European Union Joint Clinical Assessment (JCA) process, effective January 2025, requires pharmaceutical companies to submit evidence within 100 days of notification. Key challenges include uncertainty about PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcomes) parameters prior to PICO notification, limited timeframe for evidence generation, and need to reconcile differences between regulatory versus health technology assessment (HTA) evidence standards. Uncertainties involve predicting PICOs accurately and determining real-world evidence's (RWE) appropriate role. However, opportunities exist for integrated evidence planning across clinical development, regulatory, and health economics and outcomes research (HEOR) teams, leveraging real-world data to inform or address PICOs as well as support regulatory evidence requirements. Early alignment between key functional teams, combined with proactive RWE use, is essential for generating fit-for-purpose evidence that satisfies the dual scrutiny of regulatory approval and HTA relative effectiveness assessment.

Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science
Flatiron Health (United States) (US)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

RWE Submission for European Regulators and Payers: Challenges, Uncertainties, and Opportunities — Lockwood G. Taylor, Blythe Adamson · Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS