Constructing a medical lexicon: scribal practices in Armenian medical vocabulary

The curation of Armenian medical vocabulary from Late Antiquity to the early modern period reflects an intricate interplay between lexical borrowing and native word formation. Medical terminology entered Armenian mainly through Greek, Arabic and Persian. Each influenced scribal decisions based on factors such as semantic precision, syntactical compatibility and cultural relevance. Direct borrowings were often transliterated in accordance with phonological norms. Marginal glosses and commentary added pedagogical clarity. Medical concepts such as pharmacological compounds, anatomical parts and botany illustrate the linguistic continuity in the Armenian vocabulary. The resulting lexicon was neither passive adoption nor bulk translation, but instead a carefully synthesised glossary shaped by ideological and philological pressures. The Armenian medical language thus reveals the exigencies of scribes in mediating scientific knowledge, serving as a valuable case study in cross-cultural medical transmission and historical medical linguistics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medical Humanities
Published
2026-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2025-013474
Primary Topic
History of Medicine Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Constructing a medical lexicon: scribal practices in Armenian medical vocabulary

George Balabanian, Matthew Shen
Medical Humanities
History of Medicine Studies
article

Constructing a medical lexicon: scribal practices in Armenian medical vocabulary

George Balabanian, Matthew Shen
article en

Abstract

The curation of Armenian medical vocabulary from Late Antiquity to the early modern period reflects an intricate interplay between lexical borrowing and native word formation. Medical terminology entered Armenian mainly through Greek, Arabic and Persian. Each influenced scribal decisions based on factors such as semantic precision, syntactical compatibility and cultural relevance. Direct borrowings were often transliterated in accordance with phonological norms. Marginal glosses and commentary added pedagogical clarity. Medical concepts such as pharmacological compounds, anatomical parts and botany illustrate the linguistic continuity in the Armenian vocabulary. The resulting lexicon was neither passive adoption nor bulk translation, but instead a carefully synthesised glossary shaped by ideological and philological pressures. The Armenian medical language thus reveals the exigencies of scribes in mediating scientific knowledge, serving as a valuable case study in cross-cultural medical transmission and historical medical linguistics.

Medical Humanities
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
History of Medicine Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.