Post-disturbance soil monitoring in forests using remote sensing: an evidence map

Forest soils underpin ecosystem resilience and productivity but are increasingly threatened by natural and anthropogenic disturbances. Monitoring post-disturbance soil degradation at operational scales remains challenging in forests, where ground-signal obstruction and reliance on proxy indicators constrain remote sensing (RS) applications. To identify where RS can benefit soil monitoring and inform emerging reporting needs, we developed a structured evidence map of studies assessing post-disturbance forest soil degradation using RS methods. From 4338 records, 72 primary studies were synthesized across disturbance types, biomes, platforms, scales, and indicators. The evidence base is dominated by wildfire and harvesting, reflecting disturbance pathways that produce observable surface impacts. Multispectral satellite data remain the primary tool for mapping post-fire severity and erosion-related indicators, while LiDAR and stereo-photogrammetry are most often used to quantify surface deformation after harvest operations. Indicators tied to subsurface physical, chemical, or biological change remain sparsely represented due to observability limits. Overall, RS is most effective for mapping disturbance footprints, detecting surface-expressed indicators, and stratifying landscapes for targeted field assessment, rather than directly measuring soil properties. This evidence map clarifies the benefits and limits of RS, identifies persistent gaps, and highlights priorities for developing disturbance-aware soil-monitoring frameworks. It also clarifies which soil indicators are most consistently observable with RS and which require complementary approaches. By linking disturbance processes to observable indicators, this synthesis helps identify realistic RS-supported objectives that may inform future reporting frameworks within national forest monitoring and assessment programs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SOIL
Published
2026-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-12-885-2026
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Fire effects on ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Post-disturbance soil monitoring in forests using remote sensing: an evidence map

Florian Jordan, Luc Guindon, Maisy Roach-Krajewski, Charlotte Norris et al.
1 citations
SOIL
Fire effects on ecosystems
4.21
article

Post-disturbance soil monitoring in forests using remote sensing: an evidence map

Florian Jordan, Luc Guindon, Maisy Roach-Krajewski, Charlotte Norris, Xavier Giroux-Bougard, Jérôme Laganière, Catlan Dallaire, Kara Webster, David Paré
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Forest soils underpin ecosystem resilience and productivity but are increasingly threatened by natural and anthropogenic disturbances. Monitoring post-disturbance soil degradation at operational scales remains challenging in forests, where ground-signal obstruction and reliance on proxy indicators constrain remote sensing (RS) applications. To identify where RS can benefit soil monitoring and inform emerging reporting needs, we developed a structured evidence map of studies assessing post-disturbance forest soil degradation using RS methods. From 4338 records, 72 primary studies were synthesized across disturbance types, biomes, platforms, scales, and indicators. The evidence base is dominated by wildfire and harvesting, reflecting disturbance pathways that produce observable surface impacts. Multispectral satellite data remain the primary tool for mapping post-fire severity and erosion-related indicators, while LiDAR and stereo-photogrammetry are most often used to quantify surface deformation after harvest operations. Indicators tied to subsurface physical, chemical, or biological change remain sparsely represented due to observability limits. Overall, RS is most effective for mapping disturbance footprints, detecting surface-expressed indicators, and stratifying landscapes for targeted field assessment, rather than directly measuring soil properties. This evidence map clarifies the benefits and limits of RS, identifies persistent gaps, and highlights priorities for developing disturbance-aware soil-monitoring frameworks. It also clarifies which soil indicators are most consistently observable with RS and which require complementary approaches. By linking disturbance processes to observable indicators, this synthesis helps identify realistic RS-supported objectives that may inform future reporting frameworks within national forest monitoring and assessment programs.

SOILVol. 12(2)
Natural Resources Canada (CA), Canadian Sport Centre Pacific (CA), Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts (Québec) (CA), Centre Intégré de Santé et de Services Sociaux des Laurentides (CA)
U.S. Forest Service, Canadian Forest Service
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Fire effects on ecosystems
4.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.