The Lilliputians and Blefuscudians: Unlocking Privacy for Competition Law

The legislative decision-making in the field of competition law has been largely of unquestioned borrowing, expecting foreign transplants to suit local needs. This has compromised the ability of legislation and regulations to be acceptable and effective in the country. Rather than looking to the West for persistent guidance, we need to cogitate on the Preamble to the Indian Constitution to derive legitimate directions for India’s policy decisions. India needs to map out the Competition law by keeping the non-negotiable principles of justice, fairness and equity from the Constitution in their scruples. The paper argues that safeguarding consumers’ right to privacy is an important goal of competition law. The paper aims to decipher objective principles through which privacy can be measured. These principles are basic and cannot be willed or done away with. They form the minimum core of privacy and point towards concrete and controllable factors that should be subjected to minimum interpretative gymnastics. The present paper proposes two things: First, the paper aims to decipher objective parameters of privacy through the K.S Puttaswamy judgement, which declared privacy a fundamental right under the Indian Constitution. Next, the authors have formulated various theories of harm under competition law that get triggered when these parameters of privacy are violated. The authors have then suggested how these theories of harm can be contained ex-ante by imposing obligations on dominant companies through Software integration and Contractual obligations. The ex-ante framework, called privacy by design, will help develop a framework for the regulator to impose such obligations on companies designated as systemically significant digital enterprises. Second, it proposes an institutional framework for ensuring compliance with the said ex-ante regime through three courses of action: Notification (obligations of companies), roadmap (information with easy access), and control interface (directions from users). These software functionalities, when adopted by a dominant entity, shall allow them to safeguard a user’s privacy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Competition and Regulation in Network Industries
Published
2026-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17835917261437603
Primary Topic
Legal case studies and regulations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Lilliputians and Blefuscudians: Unlocking Privacy for Competition Law

Sukrit Garg, Nikita Shah
Competition and Regulation in Network Industries
Legal case studies and regulations
article

The Lilliputians and Blefuscudians: Unlocking Privacy for Competition Law

Sukrit Garg, Nikita Shah
article en

Abstract

The legislative decision-making in the field of competition law has been largely of unquestioned borrowing, expecting foreign transplants to suit local needs. This has compromised the ability of legislation and regulations to be acceptable and effective in the country. Rather than looking to the West for persistent guidance, we need to cogitate on the Preamble to the Indian Constitution to derive legitimate directions for India’s policy decisions. India needs to map out the Competition law by keeping the non-negotiable principles of justice, fairness and equity from the Constitution in their scruples. The paper argues that safeguarding consumers’ right to privacy is an important goal of competition law. The paper aims to decipher objective principles through which privacy can be measured. These principles are basic and cannot be willed or done away with. They form the minimum core of privacy and point towards concrete and controllable factors that should be subjected to minimum interpretative gymnastics. The present paper proposes two things: First, the paper aims to decipher objective parameters of privacy through the K.S Puttaswamy judgement, which declared privacy a fundamental right under the Indian Constitution. Next, the authors have formulated various theories of harm under competition law that get triggered when these parameters of privacy are violated. The authors have then suggested how these theories of harm can be contained ex-ante by imposing obligations on dominant companies through Software integration and Contractual obligations. The ex-ante framework, called privacy by design, will help develop a framework for the regulator to impose such obligations on companies designated as systemically significant digital enterprises. Second, it proposes an institutional framework for ensuring compliance with the said ex-ante regime through three courses of action: Notification (obligations of companies), roadmap (information with easy access), and control interface (directions from users). These software functionalities, when adopted by a dominant entity, shall allow them to safeguard a user’s privacy.

Competition and Regulation in Network Industries
Nirma University (IN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Legal case studies and regulations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Lilliputians and Blefuscudians: Unlocking Privacy for Competition Law — Sukrit Garg, Nikita Shah · Competition and Regulation in Network Industries (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS