Sustainable High‐Performance Green Concrete Utilizing Untreated Spent Foundry Sand: Microstructural Analysis, Mechanical Properties, and Durability

ABSTRACT During metal casting processes, large quantities of Spent Foundry Sand (SFS) are generated as waste, making its proper disposal a current research focus in industrial solid waste management. This study investigates the suitability of SFS by replacing natural river sand at equal mass ratios of 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20% to produce green concrete, with subsequent testing of compressive strength (CS), splitting tensile strength (STS), and chloride ion permeability. The results demonstrate that in terms of mechanical properties, at 28 days of curing, a 15% SFS substitution achieved maximum increases of 26% in CS and 12.87% in STS compared to control concrete. Regarding durability, the 28‐day SFS green concrete showed a 7.2% to 17.7% reduction in electrical flux relative to the control group. A recognized limitation is the use of SFS from a single source; future work should validate these findings with SFS from varied origins and include statistical robustness analysis. Furthermore, SEM/EDS analysis revealed that SFS primarily functions as a pore‐filling material without generating new hydration products. These findings indicate that using untreated SFS as a river sand substitute in concrete production reduces manufacturing costs and environmental pollution and enhances mechanical performance and durability. This “zero‐treatment” strategy provides a direct, scalable, and genuinely circular pathway for industrial waste valorization, demonstrating significant potential for large‐scale, sustainable concrete production.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Engineering Reports
Published
2026-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/eng2.70649
Primary Topic
Materials Engineering and Processing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sustainable High‐Performance Green Concrete Utilizing Untreated Spent Foundry Sand: Microstructural Analysis, Mechanical Properties, and Durability

Yiren Wang, Yibo Wang, Lian Ju, Wei Liu
Engineering Reports
Materials Engineering and Processing
article

Sustainable High‐Performance Green Concrete Utilizing Untreated Spent Foundry Sand: Microstructural Analysis, Mechanical Properties, and Durability

Yiren Wang, Yibo Wang, Lian Ju, Wei Liu
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT During metal casting processes, large quantities of Spent Foundry Sand (SFS) are generated as waste, making its proper disposal a current research focus in industrial solid waste management. This study investigates the suitability of SFS by replacing natural river sand at equal mass ratios of 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20% to produce green concrete, with subsequent testing of compressive strength (CS), splitting tensile strength (STS), and chloride ion permeability. The results demonstrate that in terms of mechanical properties, at 28 days of curing, a 15% SFS substitution achieved maximum increases of 26% in CS and 12.87% in STS compared to control concrete. Regarding durability, the 28‐day SFS green concrete showed a 7.2% to 17.7% reduction in electrical flux relative to the control group. A recognized limitation is the use of SFS from a single source; future work should validate these findings with SFS from varied origins and include statistical robustness analysis. Furthermore, SEM/EDS analysis revealed that SFS primarily functions as a pore‐filling material without generating new hydration products. These findings indicate that using untreated SFS as a river sand substitute in concrete production reduces manufacturing costs and environmental pollution and enhances mechanical performance and durability. This “zero‐treatment” strategy provides a direct, scalable, and genuinely circular pathway for industrial waste valorization, demonstrating significant potential for large‐scale, sustainable concrete production.

Engineering ReportsVol. 8(4)
Changzhou University (CN)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Materials Engineering and Processing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.