Nonprototypical packaging and strategic implications: When structural design disrupts or delivers

Ethical consumerism is increasingly central to brand strategy as consumers integrate moral values into their purchasing decisions. This paper examines how two moral orientations — ethical idealism and ethical relativism — shape responses to moral versus amoral food brands. Across three survey‑ and experiment‑based studies, it evaluates how brand morality influences perceptions, purchase intentions and loyalty. Findings show that idealistic consumers strongly prefer brands aligned with universal moral principles, whereas relativistic consumers are more flexible and open to context‑dependent trade‑offs. The paper highlights the need to align brand ethics with consumers’ moral beliefs, particularly among highly idealistic segments, and advances understanding of how personal moral frameworks shape reactions to brand ethics. This article is also included in The Business & Management Collection which can be accessed at https://hstalks.com/business/.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of brand strategy
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.69554/vqio9528
Primary Topic
Environmental Sustainability in Business
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nonprototypical packaging and strategic implications: When structural design disrupts or delivers

Kathryn R. Mercurio, Timothy Heinze, Christine M. Witt, Kristen Chatham
Journal of brand strategy
Environmental Sustainability in Business
article

Nonprototypical packaging and strategic implications: When structural design disrupts or delivers

Kathryn R. Mercurio, Timothy Heinze, Christine M. Witt, Kristen Chatham
article en

Abstract

Ethical consumerism is increasingly central to brand strategy as consumers integrate moral values into their purchasing decisions. This paper examines how two moral orientations — ethical idealism and ethical relativism — shape responses to moral versus amoral food brands. Across three survey‑ and experiment‑based studies, it evaluates how brand morality influences perceptions, purchase intentions and loyalty. Findings show that idealistic consumers strongly prefer brands aligned with universal moral principles, whereas relativistic consumers are more flexible and open to context‑dependent trade‑offs. The paper highlights the need to align brand ethics with consumers’ moral beliefs, particularly among highly idealistic segments, and advances understanding of how personal moral frameworks shape reactions to brand ethics. This article is also included in The Business & Management Collection which can be accessed at https://hstalks.com/business/.

Journal of brand strategyVol. 14(4)
California State University, Chico (US), Palo Alto Networks (United States) (US), College of Business Administration (LV)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Environmental Sustainability in Business
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.