The Relationship Between Plasma Favipiravir Concentrations and Clinical Outcomes in COVID-19

Question addressed by the study Favipiravir has shown efficacy against SARS-CoV-2 in patients under 60, but data linking plasma concentrations to clinical outcomes are limited. This study investigated whether favipiravir plasma concentrations influence clinical efficacy and outcomes in hospitalised COVID-19 patients and asked: how can antiviral dosing strategies be optimised to improve pandemic preparedness and treatment efficacy? Materials/patients and methods Adult participants were drawn from the PIONEER trial, in which patients received oral favipiravir (1800 mg twice daily on day 1, then 800 mg twice daily for nine days) plus standard care. This analysis included patients with confirmed COVID-19 and ≥75% study adherence. Samples were collected between days 5–10 post-treatment initiation. The primary outcome was time to clinical improvement. Secondary outcomes included achievement of clinical improvement and mortality risk. Results Of 140 patients (50% male; mean age 59.5 [ sd 14.8]), 29 (21%) reached target plasma concentrations. Mean time to improvement was 7.7 [5.9] vs 9.1 [7.2] days for target achievers vs non-achievers (p=0.26). Target was more often achieved in females (34%) than males (7%) (p=0.0002). Plasma concentration inversely correlated with BMI (r=–0.4; p<0.0001), with lower BMI in achievers (26.0 [5.1] vs 30.5 [6.9]; p=0.003). ALP and ALT levels were also lower in achievers (p=0.004 and p=0.02, respectively). Answer to the question Most patients did not reach target favipiravir levels. Concentrations were influenced by sex, BMI, and liver function, confirming the need for pharmacokinetically guided dosing and therapeutic monitoring to optimise antiviral efficacy in future pandemic responses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ERJ Open Research
Published
2026-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.01560-2025
Primary Topic
COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Relationship Between Plasma Favipiravir Concentrations and Clinical Outcomes in COVID-19

Marta Boffito, Francesca Conway, Henry Pertinez, Michael Pelly et al.
ERJ Open Research
COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
article

The Relationship Between Plasma Favipiravir Concentrations and Clinical Outcomes in COVID-19

Marta Boffito, Francesca Conway, Henry Pertinez, Michael Pelly, Pankaj Kumar Bhavsar, Usman Arshad, Anand Tana, Paul Curley, Pallav L. Shah, Beatriz Grinsztejn, Christopher M. Orton, Mark R. Johnson, Rebecca E. Wawman, Helen Cox, Anton Pozniak, James Tonkin, Brenda Crabtree Ramírez, Andrew Owen, Breno R. Santos
article en

Abstract

Question addressed by the study Favipiravir has shown efficacy against SARS-CoV-2 in patients under 60, but data linking plasma concentrations to clinical outcomes are limited. This study investigated whether favipiravir plasma concentrations influence clinical efficacy and outcomes in hospitalised COVID-19 patients and asked: how can antiviral dosing strategies be optimised to improve pandemic preparedness and treatment efficacy? Materials/patients and methods Adult participants were drawn from the PIONEER trial, in which patients received oral favipiravir (1800 mg twice daily on day 1, then 800 mg twice daily for nine days) plus standard care. This analysis included patients with confirmed COVID-19 and ≥75% study adherence. Samples were collected between days 5–10 post-treatment initiation. The primary outcome was time to clinical improvement. Secondary outcomes included achievement of clinical improvement and mortality risk. Results Of 140 patients (50% male; mean age 59.5 [ sd 14.8]), 29 (21%) reached target plasma concentrations. Mean time to improvement was 7.7 [5.9] vs 9.1 [7.2] days for target achievers vs non-achievers (p=0.26). Target was more often achieved in females (34%) than males (7%) (p=0.0002). Plasma concentration inversely correlated with BMI (r=–0.4; p<0.0001), with lower BMI in achievers (26.0 [5.1] vs 30.5 [6.9]; p=0.003). ALP and ALT levels were also lower in achievers (p=0.004 and p=0.02, respectively). Answer to the question Most patients did not reach target favipiravir levels. Concentrations were influenced by sex, BMI, and liver function, confirming the need for pharmacokinetically guided dosing and therapeutic monitoring to optimise antiviral efficacy in future pandemic responses.

ERJ Open Research
University of Liverpool (GB), Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán (MX), Hospital Nossa Senhora da Conceição (BR), Grupo Hospitalar Conceição (BR), Instituto Evandro Chagas (BR), Imperial College London (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.