Innovations for Stakeholder Engagement in Water Governance: A Systematic Literature Review From a Sustainability Transition Perspective

ABSTRACT Sustainable and equitable governance of water resources is among the most pressing global challenges, emphasising the need for innovations towards transitions in the water sector. Innovations for stakeholder engagement can contribute to such transitions through public participation and cross‐sectoral collaboration. However, stakeholder engagement has often been promoted as a panacea, assuming that the greater the engagement, the higher are the chances to improve governance. Important insights can be gained for water governance and transitions by understanding stakeholders' rationales for engagement, rather than solely focusing on the act of engagement. To this end, we applied a sustainability transition perspective to synthesise the empirical evidence on the traits of innovations for stakeholder engagement and to identify the indications that stakeholders follow normative, substantive, and instrumental rationales. Based on a systematic review of 61 publications, we show that innovations are characterised by multiple governance modes, with hierarchy as the most common mode and governments as a key actor often initiating stakeholder engagement. Regarding the rationales, a key indication that stakeholders follow a normative rationale is establishing power balance, whereas promoting the diversity of knowledge systems indicates a substantive rationale, and the instrumental rationale is manifested through process‐related and institutional indications, covering resources such as information and time. Future research directions relate to longitudinal and in‐depth case studies on stakeholder engagement innovations in diverse contexts. Finding congruency of meaning between stakeholders' disparate rationales is crucial for advancing innovations for engagement, which in turn can foster water transitions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Policy and Governance
Published
2026-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.70066
Primary Topic
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Innovations for Stakeholder Engagement in Water Governance: A Systematic Literature Review From a Sustainability Transition Perspective

Gül Özerol, Suvi Sojamo, Vuokko Laukka, Anne Ellermann et al.
Environmental Policy and Governance
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
article

Innovations for Stakeholder Engagement in Water Governance: A Systematic Literature Review From a Sustainability Transition Perspective

Gül Özerol, Suvi Sojamo, Vuokko Laukka, Anne Ellermann, Ulf Stein, Rob Collins, César Casiano Flores, Joanne Vinke‐de Kruijf
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Sustainable and equitable governance of water resources is among the most pressing global challenges, emphasising the need for innovations towards transitions in the water sector. Innovations for stakeholder engagement can contribute to such transitions through public participation and cross‐sectoral collaboration. However, stakeholder engagement has often been promoted as a panacea, assuming that the greater the engagement, the higher are the chances to improve governance. Important insights can be gained for water governance and transitions by understanding stakeholders' rationales for engagement, rather than solely focusing on the act of engagement. To this end, we applied a sustainability transition perspective to synthesise the empirical evidence on the traits of innovations for stakeholder engagement and to identify the indications that stakeholders follow normative, substantive, and instrumental rationales. Based on a systematic review of 61 publications, we show that innovations are characterised by multiple governance modes, with hierarchy as the most common mode and governments as a key actor often initiating stakeholder engagement. Regarding the rationales, a key indication that stakeholders follow a normative rationale is establishing power balance, whereas promoting the diversity of knowledge systems indicates a substantive rationale, and the instrumental rationale is manifested through process‐related and institutional indications, covering resources such as information and time. Future research directions relate to longitudinal and in‐depth case studies on stakeholder engagement innovations in diverse contexts. Finding congruency of meaning between stakeholders' disparate rationales is crucial for advancing innovations for engagement, which in turn can foster water transitions.

Environmental Policy and Governance
Finnish Environment Institute (FI), Ecologic Institute (DE), The Rivers Trust (GB), University of Twente (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.