A systematic review of quantitative assessments of traffic-focused urban air quality regulations

This systematic review follows PRISMA 2020 guidelines to identify whether measurable impacts have been observed following urban air quality interventions targeting private road users. A structured search was conducted on Scopus in February 2025, identifying 2088 studies. After applying strict inclusion criteria - requiring studies to examine urban-scale air quality interventions, target private road users, and apply quantitative ex post causal inference techniques - 59 studies were included for review. Our review examines publication trends, geographic focus, outlets, methods, key variables, and overall findings, classifying impacts on air quality, economic, behavioural, and health outcomes as positive, mixed, or negative. We identify three intervention types: (1) vehicle bans by type/time, (2) access charges for urban areas, and (3) fines for non-compliant vehicles. When splitting the papers by intervention type, outcome studied, and categorisation of impact, sample sizes become small. Only for intervention types (1) and (3), is there a sample of ≥ 10 studies examining the impacts on one outcome: air quality. Of these papers, a higher proportion examining fines for non-compliance found positive effects on air quality. While studies commonly report improvements in air quality and health, results are mixed for behavioural and economic variables. This review provides an up-to-date synthesis of policy effectiveness and highlights methodological and geographic gaps in the literature, supporting future evidence-based policy design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice
Published
2026-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2026.104964
Primary Topic
Air Quality and Health Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A systematic review of quantitative assessments of traffic-focused urban air quality regulations

Grant Allan, Aidan Rooney
Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice
Air Quality and Health Impacts
article

A systematic review of quantitative assessments of traffic-focused urban air quality regulations

Grant Allan, Aidan Rooney
article en

Abstract

This systematic review follows PRISMA 2020 guidelines to identify whether measurable impacts have been observed following urban air quality interventions targeting private road users. A structured search was conducted on Scopus in February 2025, identifying 2088 studies. After applying strict inclusion criteria - requiring studies to examine urban-scale air quality interventions, target private road users, and apply quantitative ex post causal inference techniques - 59 studies were included for review. Our review examines publication trends, geographic focus, outlets, methods, key variables, and overall findings, classifying impacts on air quality, economic, behavioural, and health outcomes as positive, mixed, or negative. We identify three intervention types: (1) vehicle bans by type/time, (2) access charges for urban areas, and (3) fines for non-compliant vehicles. When splitting the papers by intervention type, outcome studied, and categorisation of impact, sample sizes become small. Only for intervention types (1) and (3), is there a sample of ≥ 10 studies examining the impacts on one outcome: air quality. Of these papers, a higher proportion examining fines for non-compliance found positive effects on air quality. While studies commonly report improvements in air quality and health, results are mixed for behavioural and economic variables. This review provides an up-to-date synthesis of policy effectiveness and highlights methodological and geographic gaps in the literature, supporting future evidence-based policy design.

Transportation Research Part A Policy and PracticeVol. 208
University of Strathclyde (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Air Quality and Health Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.