Two-way capture-recapture methods with emphasis on the bootstrap

Abstract The Chapman estimator is widely used in dual system estimation for estimating the size of an elusive target population. Two independent sources are required, delivering a two-by-two table of those units identified by both sources, of those identified only by the first, and those only by the second source. Interest is in the frequency of those identified by neither source that remain hidden. While asymptotic variance estimates exist for the Chapman estimator, they often perform poorly with small sample sizes. In addition, the Chapman estimator may be biased for small sample sizes. This study explores the bias of the Chapman and a bias-corrected Chapman estimator by investigating both imputed and non-imputed (simple) bootstrap methods as alternatives for estimating variance and constructing confidence intervals. Through simulation studies, we assess the reliability of these methods by analyzing confidence interval coverage probabilities. Our findings show that the imputed bootstrap consistently delivers better performance, yielding coverage probabilities closer to the nominal level, even under moderate dependence between sources. We demonstrate the practical application of these methods with two case studies: suicide data in Cambodia and heroin use in Thailand.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Statistical Methods & Applications
Published
2026-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10260-026-00840-5
Primary Topic
Census and Population Estimation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Two-way capture-recapture methods with emphasis on the bootstrap

Rattana Lerdsuwansri, Patarawan Sangnawakij, Dankmar Böhning, Antonello Maruotti et al.
Statistical Methods & Applications
Census and Population Estimation
article

Two-way capture-recapture methods with emphasis on the bootstrap

Rattana Lerdsuwansri, Patarawan Sangnawakij, Dankmar Böhning, Antonello Maruotti, Parawan Pijitrattana, Peter Schlattmann
article en

Abstract

Abstract The Chapman estimator is widely used in dual system estimation for estimating the size of an elusive target population. Two independent sources are required, delivering a two-by-two table of those units identified by both sources, of those identified only by the first, and those only by the second source. Interest is in the frequency of those identified by neither source that remain hidden. While asymptotic variance estimates exist for the Chapman estimator, they often perform poorly with small sample sizes. In addition, the Chapman estimator may be biased for small sample sizes. This study explores the bias of the Chapman and a bias-corrected Chapman estimator by investigating both imputed and non-imputed (simple) bootstrap methods as alternatives for estimating variance and constructing confidence intervals. Through simulation studies, we assess the reliability of these methods by analyzing confidence interval coverage probabilities. Our findings show that the imputed bootstrap consistently delivers better performance, yielding coverage probabilities closer to the nominal level, even under moderate dependence between sources. We demonstrate the practical application of these methods with two case studies: suicide data in Cambodia and heroin use in Thailand.

Statistical Methods & Applications
Thammasat University (TH), Libera Università Maria SS. Assunta (IT), Khalifa University of Science and Technology (AE), Jena University Hospital (DE), University of Southampton (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Census and Population Estimation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.