An ‘Ordeal-Related Phenomenon’ in the Śaunakīya recension of the Atharvavedasaṃhitā (AVŚ 2.12)?

This article re-examines the long-standing debate over whether a hymn from the Śaunakīya recension of the Atharvavedasaṃhitā, i.e., AVŚ 2.12, contains a reference to a fire ordeal. While some early scholars interpreted the hymn through the lens of later Dharmaśāstra literature, others have argued that such readings are anachronistic. Building on the distinction between the classical Hindu ordeal (divya) and earlier “ordeal-related phenomena,” this study reassesses AVŚ 2.12 through close philological analysis and Vedic parallels and comparanda. By integrating the Paippalāda parallel, Atharvavedic internal evidence, the Kauśikasūtra ritual framing, and other later Vedic and Dharmaśāstra sources, the article argues that neither a fire ordeal nor an “ordeal-related phenomenon” can be identified in the hymn. Instead, AVŚ 2.12 is best understood within the Atharvavedic domain of counter-sorcery, where fire functions as a revelatory and destructive agent against magical opponents.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
University Library Heidelberg
Published
2026-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.11588/ejvs.2026.1.28723
Primary Topic
Indian and Buddhist Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An ‘Ordeal-Related Phenomenon’ in the Śaunakīya recension of the Atharvavedasaṃhitā (AVŚ 2.12)?

Alessandro Giudice
University Library Heidelberg
Indian and Buddhist Studies
article

An ‘Ordeal-Related Phenomenon’ in the Śaunakīya recension of the Atharvavedasaṃhitā (AVŚ 2.12)?

Alessandro Giudice
article en

Abstract

This article re-examines the long-standing debate over whether a hymn from the Śaunakīya recension of the Atharvavedasaṃhitā, i.e., AVŚ 2.12, contains a reference to a fire ordeal. While some early scholars interpreted the hymn through the lens of later Dharmaśāstra literature, others have argued that such readings are anachronistic. Building on the distinction between the classical Hindu ordeal (divya) and earlier “ordeal-related phenomena,” this study reassesses AVŚ 2.12 through close philological analysis and Vedic parallels and comparanda. By integrating the Paippalāda parallel, Atharvavedic internal evidence, the Kauśikasūtra ritual framing, and other later Vedic and Dharmaśāstra sources, the article argues that neither a fire ordeal nor an “ordeal-related phenomenon” can be identified in the hymn. Instead, AVŚ 2.12 is best understood within the Atharvavedic domain of counter-sorcery, where fire functions as a revelatory and destructive agent against magical opponents.

University Library Heidelberg
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Indian and Buddhist Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

An ‘Ordeal-Related Phenomenon’ in the Śaunakīya recension of the Atharvavedasaṃhitā (AVŚ 2.12)? — Alessandro Giudice · University Library Heidelberg (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS