Effects of standards of best practice in simulation-based training among midwifery students in China

This study aimed to determine whether simulation training designed according to INACSL Standards improves satisfaction, self-confidence, and perceptions of simulation design and educational practices among midwifery students in China. Midwives are crucial in reducing maternal and neonatal mortality, and their effectiveness is directly impacted by the quality of midwifery education. Simulation training enhances midwifery students’ clinical competence, but research on applying INACLS standards in the China is limited. A quasi-experimental study was conducted at Zhejiang Chinese Medical University from January 2023 to June 2024, using a historical control design. A total of 129 students were divided into two groups: the control group (n = 67) received standard simulation training while the intervention group (n = 62) followed the INACSL Standards. Data were collected using three scales: Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning Scale along with Simulation Design Scale (SDS) and Educational Practices in Simulation Scale (EPSS). The intervention group had significantly higher scores in student satisfaction (median difference=-0,200, 95%CI=[-0.400,0.0], P = 0.040) and active learning (mean difference=-0.130, 95%CI=[-0.222, -0.374], P = 0.006). The SDS sections of “objective/ information” (median difference=-0.200, 95%CI=[-0.400,-0.200], P < 0.001). and “guided reflection/ feedback” resulted in higher scores for the intervention group (median difference=-0.250, 95%CI=[-0.500,-0.250], P < 0.001) which contributed to a greater total SDS score (mean difference=-0.163, 95%CI=[-0.242,-0.084], P < 0.001). Self-confidence and other dimensions of the SDS and EPSS did not demonstrate any significant differences. Simulation training based on INACSL standards enhances students’ satisfaction and active learning through clear goals and structured feedback. Future studies should extend the intervention duration and integrate teaching methods to improve students’ self-confidence and professional skills.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Education
Published
2026-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-08081-y
Primary Topic
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of standards of best practice in simulation-based training among midwifery students in China

Xinyi Xia, Mengyan Xu, Yeqin Yang, Xuehua Zhu et al.
BMC Medical Education
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
article

Effects of standards of best practice in simulation-based training among midwifery students in China

Xinyi Xia, Mengyan Xu, Yeqin Yang, Xuehua Zhu, Yan Zhang, Lewei Tu, Binbin Mei, Huijie Wu
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to determine whether simulation training designed according to INACSL Standards improves satisfaction, self-confidence, and perceptions of simulation design and educational practices among midwifery students in China. Midwives are crucial in reducing maternal and neonatal mortality, and their effectiveness is directly impacted by the quality of midwifery education. Simulation training enhances midwifery students’ clinical competence, but research on applying INACLS standards in the China is limited. A quasi-experimental study was conducted at Zhejiang Chinese Medical University from January 2023 to June 2024, using a historical control design. A total of 129 students were divided into two groups: the control group (n = 67) received standard simulation training while the intervention group (n = 62) followed the INACSL Standards. Data were collected using three scales: Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning Scale along with Simulation Design Scale (SDS) and Educational Practices in Simulation Scale (EPSS). The intervention group had significantly higher scores in student satisfaction (median difference=-0,200, 95%CI=[-0.400,0.0], P = 0.040) and active learning (mean difference=-0.130, 95%CI=[-0.222, -0.374], P = 0.006). The SDS sections of “objective/ information” (median difference=-0.200, 95%CI=[-0.400,-0.200], P < 0.001). and “guided reflection/ feedback” resulted in higher scores for the intervention group (median difference=-0.250, 95%CI=[-0.500,-0.250], P < 0.001) which contributed to a greater total SDS score (mean difference=-0.163, 95%CI=[-0.242,-0.084], P < 0.001). Self-confidence and other dimensions of the SDS and EPSS did not demonstrate any significant differences. Simulation training based on INACSL standards enhances students’ satisfaction and active learning through clear goals and structured feedback. Future studies should extend the intervention duration and integrate teaching methods to improve students’ self-confidence and professional skills.

BMC Medical Education
Macau University of Science and Technology (MO), Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (CN), Sun Yat-sen University (CN), Hangzhou Women’s Hospital (CN), Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (CN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.