A metrological foundation for absolute transcriptomics using International System of Units-anchored calibrators

RNA-sequencing's conversion of molecules to reads is inconsistent. Experiment-to-experiment variations (systemic bias) create batch effects, while gene-to-gene variations (sequence-dependent bias) invalidate inter-gene comparisons, precluding a universal scale. This confines analysis to relative fold-changes, a metric unreliable across batches. We introduce TranScale: 100 biomimetic standards with SI-traceable concentrations certified by Isotope Dilution Mass Spectrometry. Co-processed within samples, they empirically characterize systemic and sequence-dependent biases, generating a library-specific calibration curve (R² > 0.97) to convert reads into absolute quantities. This approach reveals that consistent fold-changes can mask severe absolute errors, exposing systemic biases missed by conventional QC. Across laboratories, this calibration reduced median inter-lab CV from >85% to <25% and increased biological signal-to-noise from ~0 to >7.9, outperforming the widely-used tool ComBat. By anchoring RNA-seq to the SI, our work establishes the metrological foundation for data interoperability and universal benchmarks, enabling absolute comparisons of SI-traceable quantities between any two genes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Communications
Published
2026-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-70582-1
Primary Topic
Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A metrological foundation for absolute transcriptomics using International System of Units-anchored calibrators

Yuanting Zheng, Yongzhuo Zhang, Z. Y. Liu, Jingshu Li et al.
Nature Communications
Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
article

A metrological foundation for absolute transcriptomics using International System of Units-anchored calibrators

Yuanting Zheng, Yongzhuo Zhang, Z. Y. Liu, Jingshu Li, Zhiyu Tang, Caihang Zhang, Yu Zhang, Jiayi Yang, Lianhua Dong, Yuqin Liu, Tan Xiao, Chunyan Niu, Ying Yu, Xia Wang, Yang Liu, Xiang Fang, Rui Zhang, Jiayu Tian, Leming Shi, Bingwen Yang, Yunhua Gao
article en

Abstract

RNA-sequencing's conversion of molecules to reads is inconsistent. Experiment-to-experiment variations (systemic bias) create batch effects, while gene-to-gene variations (sequence-dependent bias) invalidate inter-gene comparisons, precluding a universal scale. This confines analysis to relative fold-changes, a metric unreliable across batches. We introduce TranScale: 100 biomimetic standards with SI-traceable concentrations certified by Isotope Dilution Mass Spectrometry. Co-processed within samples, they empirically characterize systemic and sequence-dependent biases, generating a library-specific calibration curve (R² > 0.97) to convert reads into absolute quantities. This approach reveals that consistent fold-changes can mask severe absolute errors, exposing systemic biases missed by conventional QC. Across laboratories, this calibration reduced median inter-lab CV from >85% to <25% and increased biological signal-to-noise from ~0 to >7.9, outperforming the widely-used tool ComBat. By anchoring RNA-seq to the SI, our work establishes the metrological foundation for data interoperability and universal benchmarks, enabling absolute comparisons of SI-traceable quantities between any two genes.

Nature CommunicationsVol. 17(1)
Shenzhen Institute of Information Technology (CN), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN), Fudan University (CN), Beijing University of Technology (CN), National Cancer Center (US), Shanghai Institutes for International Studies (CN), National Center for Clinical Laboratories (CN), National Institute of Metrology (CN)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.