Honesty, transparency, and rigour: A study of public trust in scientists in South Africa

This paper presents an updated analysis of South Africans’ trust in scientists, situated within the South African context and based on a secondary analysis of the Trust in Science and Science-Related Populism (TISP) data set. We find that South Africans have moderately high trust in scientists (ranked 23rd) and perceive scientists as having moderately benevolent intentions and moderate integrity. South Africans’ trust in scientists is mainly based on trust in the scientific method. We also present evidence on how trust is shaped by factors such as gender, age, education, religion, income, and ideology. While most South Africans trust scientists, many are concerned about the unequal distribution of the benefits of science. Furthermore, there is a strong public demand for scientists to communicate their work more effectively, engage in dialogue with society, and advocate for the value of science in policymaking. Overall, our results provide a nuanced picture of trust in scientists in South Africa, with implications for future research, communication practices, and policymaking.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
South African Journal of Science
Published
2026-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2026/21970
Primary Topic
Climate Change Communication and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Honesty, transparency, and rigour: A study of public trust in scientists in South Africa

Niels G. Mede, Viktoria Cologna, Marina Joubert, Marietjie Botes et al.
South African Journal of Science
Climate Change Communication and Perception
article

Honesty, transparency, and rigour: A study of public trust in scientists in South Africa

Niels G. Mede, Viktoria Cologna, Marina Joubert, Marietjie Botes, Simone Rödder, Milandré van Lill, Lars Guenther
article en

Abstract

This paper presents an updated analysis of South Africans’ trust in scientists, situated within the South African context and based on a secondary analysis of the Trust in Science and Science-Related Populism (TISP) data set. We find that South Africans have moderately high trust in scientists (ranked 23rd) and perceive scientists as having moderately benevolent intentions and moderate integrity. South Africans’ trust in scientists is mainly based on trust in the scientific method. We also present evidence on how trust is shaped by factors such as gender, age, education, religion, income, and ideology. While most South Africans trust scientists, many are concerned about the unequal distribution of the benefits of science. Furthermore, there is a strong public demand for scientists to communicate their work more effectively, engage in dialogue with society, and advocate for the value of science in policymaking. Overall, our results provide a nuanced picture of trust in scientists in South Africa, with implications for future research, communication practices, and policymaking.

South African Journal of ScienceVol. 122(3/4)
Universität Hamburg (DE), University of Zurich (CH), Stellenbosch University (ZA), ETH Zurich (CH), Institute for Biodiversity (DE), Department of Social Sciences (RU), Collegium Helveticum (CH), Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (CH), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Climate Change Communication and Perception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.