Causal Inference Without Complete Information: A Closed‐form Solution

Abstract Understanding the effect of certain factors or interventions is the objective of many researchers and decision‐makers. However, when using quantitative analyses for this purpose, it is virtually impossible to include all relevant data, which often leads to biased coefficients that only indicate correlation rather than effect. To help overcome this limitation, we introduce relatively simple formulas (closed‐form solutions) to estimate direct relationships between variables in the presence of unobserved factors (confounders) that simultaneously affect the two variables of interest. The estimated coefficient can be interpreted as causal when it is possible to rule out bidirectional relationships. Simulations show that our estimates match the unbiased coefficients up to 15 decimal places when the controls are independent of the omitted variables, significantly outperforming the respective ordinary least squares (OLS) estimates in all scenarios considered. We also find that, even with moderate correlation between the controls and the unobserved variables (up to 0.40), our method leads to estimates closer to the actual causal coefficients as compared to the OLS estimates in more than 70% of the cases. A real‐world dataset is used to illustrate the application of the method in the field of management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Management
Published
2026-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.70062
Primary Topic
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Causal Inference Without Complete Information: A Closed‐form Solution

Fernando Moreira
British Journal of Management
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
article

Causal Inference Without Complete Information: A Closed‐form Solution

Fernando Moreira
article en

Abstract

Abstract Understanding the effect of certain factors or interventions is the objective of many researchers and decision‐makers. However, when using quantitative analyses for this purpose, it is virtually impossible to include all relevant data, which often leads to biased coefficients that only indicate correlation rather than effect. To help overcome this limitation, we introduce relatively simple formulas (closed‐form solutions) to estimate direct relationships between variables in the presence of unobserved factors (confounders) that simultaneously affect the two variables of interest. The estimated coefficient can be interpreted as causal when it is possible to rule out bidirectional relationships. Simulations show that our estimates match the unbiased coefficients up to 15 decimal places when the controls are independent of the omitted variables, significantly outperforming the respective ordinary least squares (OLS) estimates in all scenarios considered. We also find that, even with moderate correlation between the controls and the unobserved variables (up to 0.40), our method leads to estimates closer to the actual causal coefficients as compared to the OLS estimates in more than 70% of the cases. A real‐world dataset is used to illustrate the application of the method in the field of management.

British Journal of Management
University of Edinburgh (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.