Nonprototypical packaging and strategic implications: When structural design disrupts or delivers

In a saturated consumer packaged goods market, nonprototypical (NP) or ‘chaos’ packaging has become a way for challenger brands to attract attention and differentiate. Yet little is known about how structural atypicality interacts with category norms and consumer expectations to shape perceptions of safety, quality, trust and brand fit. Drawing on cue utilisation theory, typicality research and sensation transference, this study examines the double‑edged nature of packaging disruption. A split‑cell survey in Argentina, the UK and the USA (n = 600) compared reactions to typical versus NP formats across four product categories. Findings show that while atypical packaging boosts visual salience, it often lowers trust and product perceptions, except in categories with long‑standing, stagnant norms. The paper offers theoretical and managerial guidance on when packaging disruption is likely to support—or undermine—consumer inference and purchase interest. This article is also included in The Business & Management Collection which can be accessed at https://hstalks.com/business/.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of brand strategy
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.69554/xhzr8460
Primary Topic
Consumer Packaging Perceptions and Trends
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nonprototypical packaging and strategic implications: When structural design disrupts or delivers

Kevin Waters, Shelby Howard, Jon Watts, Fernando Arendar
Journal of brand strategy
Consumer Packaging Perceptions and Trends
article

Nonprototypical packaging and strategic implications: When structural design disrupts or delivers

Kevin Waters, Shelby Howard, Jon Watts, Fernando Arendar
article en

Abstract

In a saturated consumer packaged goods market, nonprototypical (NP) or ‘chaos’ packaging has become a way for challenger brands to attract attention and differentiate. Yet little is known about how structural atypicality interacts with category norms and consumer expectations to shape perceptions of safety, quality, trust and brand fit. Drawing on cue utilisation theory, typicality research and sensation transference, this study examines the double‑edged nature of packaging disruption. A split‑cell survey in Argentina, the UK and the USA (n = 600) compared reactions to typical versus NP formats across four product categories. Findings show that while atypical packaging boosts visual salience, it often lowers trust and product perceptions, except in categories with long‑standing, stagnant norms. The paper offers theoretical and managerial guidance on when packaging disruption is likely to support—or undermine—consumer inference and purchase interest. This article is also included in The Business & Management Collection which can be accessed at https://hstalks.com/business/.

Journal of brand strategyVol. 14(4)
Dai Nippon Printing (Japan) (JP), Stratasys (Israel) (IL), Clinical Insights (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Consumer Packaging Perceptions and Trends
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.